Paul J. Sarvadi
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
Dear Stockholder:Fellow Stockholders:
On behalf of your Board of Directors and management, I am pleased to invite you are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Insperity, Inc. to be held at Insperity’s Corporate Headquarters,in the Auditorium of Centre I in the Auditorium,of our corporate headquarters located at 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339, on June May 22, 2023, at 1:30 2016, at 10:00 a.m.p.m. Houston, Texas time.
Please carefully consider the information in the enclosed proxy statement regarding the proposals to be presented at the meeting. Our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 is also enclosed.
It is important that your shares are represented at the meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please completesubmit your proxy via the Internet or telephone or by completing and returnreturning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card in the accompanying envelope orprovided. You may also attend and vote using the telephone or Internet procedures that may be provided to you. Please note that using any of these methods to vote will not prevent you from attending the meeting and voting in person.
Thank you for the year ended December 31, 2015 is also enclosed with these materials.
Sincerely,
Paul J. Sarvadi
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF INSPERITY, INC.
Time: 1:30 2016p.m. Houston, Texas time
Place: The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Insperity, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the Company’s Corporate HeadquartersAuditorium in Centre I in the Auditorium, located at of our corporate headquarters
19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339
At the meeting, stockholders will consider and act upon the following matters:
1.To elect the three nominees named in the proxy statement to the Board of Directors;
2.Approval of the Insperity, Inc. Incentive Plan;
3.To cast an advisory vote to approve executive compensation (“say-on-pay” vote);
4.To cast an advisory vote on June 30, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. (Houston, Texas time),the frequency of holding the advisory vote on executive compensation; and
5.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the following purposes:year ending December 31, 2023.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials: A full set of all proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 30, 2016May 22, 2023 is enclosed with this Notice.notice. Additionally, the Company’s proxy statement, most recent annual report on Form 10-K, and other proxy materials are available at www.insperity.com/annualmeeting.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on May 9, 2016April 4, 2023 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.
| It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders regardless of whether you plan to attend. Therefore, please | ||||||||||||||
By Order of the Board of Directors
Daniel D. Herink
General Counsel and Secretary
Kingwood, Texas
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Stockholder Communications and Engagement | ||||||
| Outstanding Equity Awards Table at | ||||||
INSPERITY, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors, (“the Board”)or Board, of Insperity, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company” or “Insperity”), for use at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 30, 2016,May 22, 2023, and at any reconvened meeting after an adjournment thereof. The 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at 10:00 a.m.1:30 p.m. (Houston, Texas time), at the Company’s Corporate Headquarters, Centre I in the Auditorium locatedin Centre I of our corporate headquarters at 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339.
The approximate date on which this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card will first be sent to stockholders is June 2, 2016.April 18, 2023.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND THE ANNUAL MEETING
Why am I receiving these materials?
We are providing these proxy materials to holders of shares of our common stock in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board to vote at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof.
When and where is the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?
Our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on May 22, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. (Houston, Texas time), in the Auditorium in Centre I of our corporate headquarters at 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339.
Who can vote at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?
The Board has fixed April 4, 2023 as the record date for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Stockholders of record at the close of business on May 9, 2016, the record date for the determination of stockholders of the CompanyApril 4, 2023 will be entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any reconvened meeting after an adjournment thereof, 21,384,413
business on April 4, 2023, 38,203,488 shares of the Company’sour common stock, par value $0.01 per share, (the “Common Stock”), were outstanding. Each share of Common Stockour common stock is entitled to one vote upon each of the matters to be voted on at the meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy,2023 Annual Meeting of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is required for a quorum. If a quorum is presentStockholders.
What matters will be voted on at the meeting, under2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, what are my voting choices, and how does the Company’s Bylaws, actionBoard recommend that I vote?
At the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you will be asked to vote on a matterfive proposals:
| Insperity | 1 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
| Proposal | Voting Choices | Board Recommendation | ||||||
Proposal 1: Election of the three director nominees named in this proxy statement to the Board of Directors | •For •Against •Abstain | FOR the election of all three director nominees | ||||||
Proposal 2: Vote to approve the Insperity, Inc. Incentive Plan | •For •Against •Abstain | FOR | ||||||
Proposal 3: Advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation (“say-on-pay”) | •For •Against •Abstain | FOR | ||||||
Proposal 4: Advisory vote on the frequency of holding the advisory vote on executive compensation | •One year •Two years •Three years •Abstain | ONE YEAR | ||||||
Proposal 5: Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023 | •For •Against •Abstain | FOR | ||||||
In addition, you may vote on any other business as may properly come before the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Board is not currently aware of any such other matters.
How many votes are needed to electapprove each proposal?
The following votes will be required to adopt each proposal:
•Proposal 1: A nominee for director nominees shallwill be approvedelected if the votes cast in favor of the matter or“FOR” such nominee exceed the votes cast opposing“AGAINST” such nominee.
•Proposal 2: The proposal will be approved if votes cast “FOR” such proposal exceed the matter orvotes cast “AGAINST” such nominee, as applicable.proposal.
•Proposal 3: The proposal will be approved if votes cast “FOR” such proposal exceed the votes cast “AGAINST” such proposal.
•Proposal 4: The frequency receiving the greatest number of votes cast will be considered approved.
•Proposal 5: The proposal will be approved if votes cast “FOR” such proposal exceed the votes cast “AGAINST” such proposal.
In determining the number of votes cast, shares abstaining from voting or not voted on a matter will not be treated as votes cast. Accordingly, although proxies containing broker non-votes (which result when a broker holding shares for a beneficial owner has not received timely voting instructions on certain matters from such beneficial owner and when the broker does not otherwise have discretionary power to vote on a particular matter) are considered “shares present” in determining whether there is a quorum present at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, they are not treated as votes cast with respect to the election of directors, and thus will not affect the outcome of the voting on the election of directors or any of the other proposals on non-routine matters to be voted on at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, a broker
What is the difference between holding shares foras a beneficial owner will have the discretion to vote such“stockholder of record” and having shares for a beneficial owner with respect to routine matters, suchheld in “street name”?
If your name is registered on our stockholder records as the ratificationowner of the appointmentshares, then you are the “stockholder of record.” If your shares are held by a bank, broker, or other custodian, then your shares are considered held in “street name.”
If I am a stockholder of record, how can I vote my shares?
If you are a stockholder of record, then you may vote in one of four ways:
•by attending the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
meeting and voting at the meeting;
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership1 | Percent of Class | ||||||
| Michael W. Brown | 36,846 | * | ||||||
| Peter A. Feld | 3,338,886 | 2 | 15.61 | % | ||||
| Eli Jones | — | * | ||||||
| Carol R. Kaufman | 10,627 | * | ||||||
| Michelle McKenna-Doyle | 1,447 | * | ||||||
| John M. Morphy | — | * | ||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | 625,382 | 3 | 2.92 | % | ||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | 1,611,797 | 4 | 7.54 | % | ||||
| Norman R. Sorensen | 2,646 | * | ||||||
| Austin P. Young | 31,042 | * | ||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | 110,408 | 5 | * | |||||
| Jay E. Mincks | 47,508 | * | ||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | 25,252 | * | ||||||
| Starboard Value LP | 3,335,976 | 6 | 15.60 | % | ||||
| BlackRock Fund Advisors | 2,008,678 | 7 | 9.39 | % | ||||
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 1,564,844 | 8 | 7.32 | % | ||||
| Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (14 Persons) | 5,874,084 | 27.47 | % | |||||
| Insperity | 2 | ||||||||
•by mail by signing, dating, and returning your proxy in the envelope provided;
•via the Internet at the address listed on your proxy card; or
•by telephone using the toll-free number listed on your proxy card.
For stockholders of record, if you either return your signed proxy or submit your proxy using the Internet or telephone procedures available to you, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you properly execute and return the proxy without indicating a voting direction, then your shares will be voted FOR the election of the nominees listed herein as directors, FOR Proposals 2, 3, and 5, and ONE YEAR for Proposal 4. For stockholders of record, if you do not vote your shares as described above, then your shares will not be voted and will not be counted as present at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders for the purposes of establishing a quorum.
If my shares are held in street name, how can I vote my shares? Does my bank, broker, or other custodian need my instructions in order to vote my shares?
If your shares are held in street name, then the availability of telephone and Internet voting will depend on the processes of your custodian. Therefore, if your shares are held in street name, we recommend that you follow the voting instructions on the form that you receive from your custodian. If you hold your shares in street name through a custodian, you are invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but you must obtain a signed proxy from your custodian in order to vote your shares at the meeting.
If your shares are held in street name and you do not give your custodian direction on how to vote your shares, then your custodian will be unable to vote your shares on most matters. For the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, your custodian may not vote your shares on Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 2 (approval of the Insperity, Inc. Incentive Plan), Proposal 3 (advisory approval of executive compensation), or Proposal 4 (advisory approval of frequency of advisory vote on executive compensation). This would be a “broker non-vote” and these shares will not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal and therefore will have no effect on the vote, assuming a quorum is present; however, your shares would be considered “present” for purposes of establishing a quorum. Please instruct your custodian so your vote can be counted. With respect to Proposal 5 (ratification of independent auditor), the custodian may exercise its discretion to vote for or against that proposal in the absence of your instruction.
What is the quorum requirement?
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid annual meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock is required for a quorum. If a quorum is present at the meeting, under our Bylaws, action on a matter or to elect director nominees shall be approved if the votes cast in favor of the matter or nominee exceed the votes cast opposing the matter or such nominee, as applicable. Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy, if a valid proxy is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other agent, or if you vote live at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders may be adjourned to another date.
What if another matter is properly brought before the meeting?
The proxy confers discretionary authority to the persons named in the proxy authorizing those persons to vote, in their discretion, on any other matters properly presented at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board is not currently aware of any such other matters.
Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?
We pay the expense of preparing, printing, and mailing proxy materials to our stockholders. In addition to solicitation by mail, our officers or employees (none of whom will receive additional compensation) may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, email, or personal interview. We will also reimburse brokerage houses and other nominees for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock.
What does it mean if I receive more than one copy of the proxy materials?
If you receive more than one copy of the proxy materials, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions accompanying each of the proxy materials that you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
| Insperity | 3 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Can I change or revoke my vote after submitting my proxy?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may change or revoke your vote by timely: (1) submitting written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company at the address for our corporate headquarters, provided above; (2) submitting another proxy card that is properly signed and later dated; (3) submitting a proxy again on the Internet or by telephone; or (4) voting in person at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
If you hold your shares in street name, you may change or revoke your vote by timely: (1) submitting new instructions in the manner provided by your custodian or (2) contacting your custodian to obtain a proxy to vote at the meeting.
How can I find out the results of the voting at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In addition, final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within four business days after the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8‑K to publish the final results.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth the number and the percentage of shares of our common stock that were beneficially owned as of April 4, 2023 by: (1) each person known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our common stock; (2) all current directors and persons nominated to become directors; (3) each of our executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table; and (4) all of our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group.
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership1 | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||||||||
| Timothy T. Clifford | 14,907 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| Eli Jones | 4,573 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| Carol R. Kaufman | 35,997 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| John L. Lumelleau | 8,050 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ellen H. Masterson | 11,565 | 2 | * | |||||||||||||||||
| Randall Mehl | 14,637 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| John M. Morphy | 9,041 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| Latha Ramchand | 8,050 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | 255,206 | 3 | * | |||||||||||||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | 1,498,740 | 4 | 3.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| James D. Allison | 47,570 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | 186,382 | 5 | * | |||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Herink | 24,099 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | 26,174 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
| BlackRock, Inc. | 5,592,538 | 6 | 14.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Mawer Investment Management Ltd. | 4,436,394 | 7 | 11.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| The Vanguard Group | 3,692,828 | 8 | 9.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (14 Persons) | 2,144,991 | 5.61 | % | |||||||||||||||||
_________________________
* Represents less than 1%.
1Except as otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities shown to be owned by such stockholder. The address for each officer and director is in care of Insperity, Inc., 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339.
As of April 4, 2023, none of these individuals held options exercisable for shares of our common stock. The number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each person includes unvested restricted stock units as of April 4, 2023. Restricted stock units do not have voting rights.
| Insperity | 4 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Unvested Restricted Stock Units | ||||||||||||
| Timothy T. Clifford | — | ||||||||||||
| — | |||||||||||||
| Carol R. Kaufman | — | ||||||||||||
| John | — | ||||||||||||
| — | |||||||||||||
| — | |||||||||||||
| John M. Morphy | — | ||||||||||||
| Latha Ramchand | — | ||||||||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | — | ||||||||||||
| James D. Allison | 10,505 | ||||||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | 16,040 | ||||||||||||
10,505 | |||||||||||||
| 40,988 | |||||
2 Includes 100 shares owned by Conrad J. Masterson Jr. (spouse).
3Includes 102,143 shares owned by the RDKB Rawson LP, 96,716 shares owned by the R&D Rawson LP, 51,796 owned by the DMR Spousal Lifetime Trust and 700 shares owned by Dawn M. Rawson (spouse). Mr. Rawson shares voting and investment power over all such shares with his wife, except for 700 shares owned by his wife. 4 Includes 947,612 shares owned by Our Ship Limited Partnership, Ltd. and 33,691 shares owned by Paul J. Sarvadi and Vicki D. Sarvadi (spouse). Mr. Sarvadi shares voting and investment power over all such shares with his spouse. Also includes shares pledged to banks as collateral for loans. The Board determined the amount of shares pledged by Mr. Sarvadi was insignificant under our pledging policy. See “Corporate Governance — Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging of Our Common Stock” for a further discussion. 5 Includes 109,808 shares owned by S.C.A Legacy, Ltd. 6 Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 26, 2023. BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 5,336,386 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,592,538 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. 7 Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2023. Mawer Investment Management Ltd. reported sole voting power with respect to 4,223,911 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,436,394 shares. The address of Mawer Investment Management Ltd. is 600, 517 - 10th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2R 0A8. 8 Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023. The Vanguard Group reported shared voting power with respect to 61,376 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,595,835 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 96,993 shares with Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company. The address of the Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. |
PROPOSAL NUMBER 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
General
In accordance with theour Certificate of Incorporation, of the Company, the members of the Board are divided into three classes. TheOur Certificate of Incorporation also provides that such classes shall be as nearly equal in number as possible. The terms of office of the Class I, Class II and Class III directors expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2017, 20182023, 2024, and 2016,2025, respectively. The term of office of each of Michael Brown, Eli Jones, John MorphyTimothy T. Clifford, Ellen H. Masterson, and Richard Rawson,Latha Ramchand, who comprise the current Class IIII directors, expires at
the time of the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or as soon thereafter as their successors (if any) are elected and qualified. As previously announced, Dr. Jones has decided not to stand for re-election to the Board and to retire from the Board at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Messrs. Brown, Morphy and Rawson have been nominated for re-election to the Board as described below. All nominees have consented to be named in this proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected.
ten.
| Insperity | 5 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Voting; Approval Requirements
All proxies will be voted in favor of the nominees named below unless a stockholder has indicated otherwise. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of the Common Stockour common stock present in person or by proxy at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is required for election of the nominees. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be deemed votes not cast. Under our Bylaws and in accordance with Delaware law, a director’s term extends until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she resigns or is removed from office. Thus, an incumbent director who fails to receive the required vote for re-election at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders would continue serving as a director (sometimes referred to as a “holdover director”), generally until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, as a condition to being nominated to continue to serve as a director, theeach incumbent director nominees havenominee has submitted an irrevocable letter of resignation that is effective upon and only in the event that (i) such nominee(1) he or she fails to receive the required vote; and (ii)(2) the Board accepts such resignation. In such an event, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to make a recommendation to the Board as to whether the Board should accept the resignation, and the Board is required to decide whether to accept the resignation and to disclose its decision-making process within 90 days from the certification of the election results. In addition, if Mr. Feld, Ms. McKenna-Doyle, or Mr. Sorensen is not re-elected, then, pursuant to the 2016 Agreement, Starboard may have the right to nominate a replacement director as described above.
If, at the time of or prior to the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, any of the nomineesnominee should be unable or decline to serve, the discretionary authority provided in the proxy may be used to vote for a substitute or substitutes designated by the Board. The Board has no reason to believe that any substitute nominee or nominees will be required. No proxy will be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named herein.
Nominees for Director
The following individuals have been nominated for re-election to the Board as Class IIII directors with terms expiring at the 20192026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
 | Timothy T. Clifford | •Lead Independent Director •Director since: 2016 •Age: 67 •Committees: Compensation Committee (Chair); Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ||||||
Mr. Clifford brings extensive technology, entrepreneurial and leadership experience to the Board. His substantial experience with providing HR-related services to businesses, along with his entrepreneurial background and knowledge of cloud-based software solutions for the HR services industry, provide key perspectives to the Board on matters that directly impact our business and the businesses of our customers.
| Insperity | 6 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
 | Ellen H. Masterson | •Independent Director •Director since: 2017 •Age: 72 •Committees: Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee (Chair) | ||||||
Ms. Masterson joined the Company as a director in November 1997. Mr. Brown is the past chairman of the NASDAQ Stock Market Board of Directors and a past governor of the National Association of Securities Dealers. Mr. Brown joined Microsoft Corporation in 1989 as its treasurer and became its chief financial officer in 1993, in which capacity he served until his retirement in July 1997. Prior to joining Microsoft, Mr. Brown spent 18 years with Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Brown is also a director of EMC Corporation (NYSE: EMC), Stifel Financial Corporation (NYSE: SF) and VMware, Inc. (NYSE: VMW). He serves on the audit and finance committees of EMC Corporation; audit and compensation committees of VMware, Inc.; and risk management/corporate governance committee of Stifel Financial Corporation. Mr. Brown also serves orSeptember 2017. Since 2014, Ms. Masterson has served as an independent director of Westwood Holdings Group (NYSE: WHG), an investment management firm with over $10 billion in assets under management, and Westwood Trust, a director, trustee or advisor of several private businesses, civic and charitable organizations. Mr. Brown holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics fromTexas state-chartered trust company. Ms. Masterson is the University of Washington in Seattle.
Ms. Masterson brings extensive knowledge of financial reporting and accounting issues faced by companies in the business services industry, as well as experience with strategic planning and corporate governance. With her experience as a partner in an international accounting firm, as a chief financial officer for a public company, and as an audit committee member of a public company board, forMs. Masterson strengthens the Board’s financial reporting and accounting acumen, and provides significant expertise from which she can draw to advise and consult with the Board and management on financial and audit-related matters.
 | Latha Ramchand | •Independent Director •Director since: 2019 •Age: 62 •Committees: Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee | ||||||
Dr. Ramchand joined the Company as a director in December 2019. Dr. Ramchand has served as Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost at the University of Missouri since her appointment in August 2018. Previously, Dr. Ramchand served as dean of the C.T. Bauer College of Business.Business of the University of Houston from 2011 to 2018. Prior to her deanship, she served as associate dean from 2006. During her tenure as dean, Bauer College grew enrollment to over 6,400 students, oversaw the creation of a social entrepreneurship program, expanded programs in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization, and created a venture fund and a start-up accelerator. In her current role, she has led the development of a new responsibility-centered budget model, and the implementation of a new strategic plan for the University of Missouri. Dr. Ramchand is also a certified financial analyst and served on the advisory board of the CFP Board of Standards from 2019 to 2022. She received her Ph.D., Finance, from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management of Northwestern University in 1993, her M.A., Economics, from the University of Bombay in 1983 and a B.A., Economics, also from the University of Bombay in 1981.
our client base.
| The Board recommends that stockholders vote “For” all of the nominees listed above, and proxies executed and returned will be so voted unless contrary instructions are indicated thereon. | ||
| Insperity | 7 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Directors Not Currently Subject to Election
The following directors are not subject to election at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
Class III DirectorII Directors (Term Expires at 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders)
 | Carol R. Kaufman | •Independent Director •Director since: 2013 •Age: 73 •Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair); Compensation Committee | ||||||
Ms. Kaufman brings extensive financial and business experience, including in corporate governance, risk management, executive compensation and employee benefits to the Board. Her varied roles within The Cooper Companies, Inc. and prior board service provide the Board with additional expertise on governance and on evaluating and executing strategic initiatives.
 | John L. Lumelleau | •Independent Director •Director since: 2019 •Age: 71 •Committees: Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee | ||||||
Mr. Lumelleau joined the Company as a director in December 2019. Mr. Lumelleau served as the president and chief executive officer of Lockton, Inc., the largest privately held independent insurance broker and a top 10 insurance broker globally, from 2002 until his retirement in 2017. Following his retirement, he served as an independent advisor to Lockton until 2021 and continues to serve on the board of directors of Lockton. In 2019, he also became chairman of the board of Orchid Underwriters Agency, LLC, a leading specialty underwriter of catastrophe exposed property insurance, and is a member of the management advisory board of TowerBrook Capital Partners. While he served as president and chief executive officer, Lockton’s revenues grew from $92 million to $1.4 billion and it expanded from 7 offices to 85 offices globally. Previously, he served as president of Lockton from 2000 to 2002 and as operations executive from 1997 to 1999. Prior to joining Lockton, Mr. Lumelleau held various roles at Alexander & Alexander, Inc. and its successor, AON Risk Services, from 1976 until 1997, including executive vice president of global retail sales. He currently serves on the board of trustees of Fordham University and previously served on the Board of Overseers of the St. John’s University School of Risk Management & Actuarial Sciences and the board of directors of The Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers. Mr. Lumelleau holds a Bachelor of Arts from Fordham University.
Mr. Lumelleau brings substantial leadership, industry and business experience to the Board, including an extensive knowledge of the insurance industry. Mr. Lumelleau’s previous experience as the long-time CEO of the world’s largest
| Insperity | 8 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
privately held insurance brokerage firm provides the Board with substantial knowledge, insight and key perspectives related to risk management and the opportunities and challenges faced by growth-oriented organizations.
 | Paul J. Sarvadi | •Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer •Director since: 1986 •Age: 66 | ||||||
Mr. Sarvadi, co-founder of the Company and its subsidiaries, has been a director since the Company’s inception in 1986. He has also served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1989 and as president of the Company from 1989 to August 2003. He attended Rice University and the University of Houston prior to starting and operating several small companies. Mr. Sarvadi has served as president of the National Association of Professional Employer Organizations (“NAPEO”) and was a member of its board of directors for five years. In 2001, Mr. Sarvadi was selected as the 2001 National Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year ® for service industries. In 2004, he received the Conn Family Distinguished New Venture Leader Award from Mays Business School at Texas A&M University. In 2007, he was inducted into the Texas Business Hall of Fame.
Mr. Sarvadi brings substantial business and operational experience to the Board, including an extensive knowledge of sales, customer relationships, and issues affecting small to medium-sized businesses. Mr. Sarvadi’s role as a co-founder of the Company and lengthy service as chief executive officer of the Company provide to the Board extensive knowledge and insight of our operations and issues affecting the Company as well as the broader Professional Employer Organization (“PEO”) industry. Mr. Sarvadi’s previous experience starting and operating several small businesses, as well as his frequent interaction with the Company’s clients, provide valuable insight to the challenges facing small to medium-sized businesses, which is a principal focus of the Company.
Class III Directors (Term Expires at 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders)
 | Eli Jones | •Independent Director •Director since: 2020 •Age: 61 •Committees: Compensation Committee | ||||||
Dr. Eli Jones rejoined the Company as a Class III director in December 2020. Since June 2021, Dr. Jones has announced that he will not stand for re-election to the Boardserved as a marketing professor and will retire from the Board when his term expiresendowed chair at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. SinceMays Business School at Texas A&M University. From July 2015 through May 2021, Dr. Jones has served as the Dean of the Mays Business School. Dr. Jones has served as a member of the board of directors of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (Nasdaq: FFIN) since January 2022. He has also served on the board of trustees of the Invesco family of funds since 2016, and served on their Governance Committee from 2016 until 2021. Dr. Jones was also a director of the Company from 2004 through June 2016. Before joining the Mays Business School, at Texas A&M University. Prior to his current position, from 2012, he was the Dean of the Sam M. Walton College of Business at the University of Arkansas and holder of the Sam M. Walton Leadership Chair in Business. Prior to joining the faculty at the University of Arkansas, he was Dean of the E. J.E.J. Ourso College of Business and Ourso Distinguished Professor of Business at Louisiana State University (“LSU”) from 2008 to 2012; and Professor of Marketing and Associate Dean at the C.T. Bauer College of Business at the University of Houston from 2007 to 2008;2008, where he also was an Associate Professor of Marketing from 2002 to 2007; and an assistant professor from 1997 until 2002. He taught at Texas A&M University for several years before joining the faculty of the University of Houston. Dr. Jones served as the executive director of the Program for Excellence in Selling and the founding director of the Sales Excellence Institute at the University of Houston from 1997 to 2007. Before becoming a professor, he worked in sales and sales management for three Fortune 100 companies: Quaker Oats, Nabisco and Frito-Lay. Dr. Jones has also published three books and approximately 50 research articles in leading peer-reviewed academic journals in sales and sales management. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Journalism in 1982, his MBA in 1986, and his Ph.D. in 1997, all from Texas A&M University.
| Insperity | 9 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Dr. Jones brings to the Board significant experience and cutting-edge knowledge and expertise. He is considered a “sales scientist” in that he conducts and publishes cutting-edge research in sales, sales management, marketing strategy, leadership and customer relationship management based on data from organizations world-wide, which are areas critical to the Company. Dr. Jones is able to draw upon his research to provide the Board knowledge with respect to the Insperity sales force. Dr. Jones’ prior service as Dean of the E. J.Mays Business School at Texas A&M University; Dean of the E.J. Ourso College of Business and Ourso Distinguished Professor of Business at LSU, and as Dean of the Sam M. Walton College of Business at the University of Arkansas and holder of the Sam M. Walton Leadership Chair in Business, as well as his new role as Dean of the Mays Business School at Texas A&M University, demonstrate his leadership and broad-based business acumen.
 | Randall Mehl | •Independent Director •Director since: 2017 •Age: 55 •Committees: Compensation Committee | ||||||
Mr. Mehl brings extensive experience in licensesthe technology and delivers innovative miniaturization technologies and products for next-generation electronic devices, from June 2013 to April 2014; Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq: IDTI), a company which designs, develops, manufactures and markets a range of semiconductor solutions for the advanced communications, computing and consumer industries, from June 2012 to February 2014; Unwired Planet, Inc. (Nasdaq: UPIP) f/k/a Openwave Systems, Inc., a company with a portfolio of patents many ofbusiness process outsourcing sectors, including PEOs, which are considered foundationaldirectly relevant to mobile communications,our company’s objectives. His background as an investor, adviser and span smart devices, cloud technologiesboard member focused on these industries provides an important investor perspective to our Board and unified messaging, from July 2011provides key insight to March 2014the Board as it analyzes our long-term objectives. Further, due to his experience in technology and as chairman from September 2011with technology companies involved in software development and cybersecurity, Mr. Mehl brings additional insights to July 2013; and SeaChange International, Inc. (Nasdaq: SEAC), a leading global multi-screen video software company, from December 2010our Board regarding these areas that are critical to January 2013. Mr. Feld has also served as a member of the audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees of several of the boards of directors on which he has served. Mr. Feld received a BA in economics from Tufts University.our business.
 | John M. Morphy | •Independent Director •Director since: 2016 •Age: 75 •Committees: Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee | ||||||
Mr. Feld’s extensive knowledge of the capital markets and corporate governance practices as a result of his investment and private equity background makes him a valuable asset to the Board.
| Insperity | 10 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Mr. Morphy brings extensive financial, accounting and industry experience to the Board. His more than 20 years of directors of RingCentral, Inc. (NYSE: RNG), where she serves on the auditfinancial leadership experience for various public corporations and compensation committees. Ms. McKenna-Doyle received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Auburn University and an MBA from the Crummer Graduate School of Business, Rollins College. She was formerly licensed as a certified public accountant in the State of Georgia. She has extensive experience in the mediamany facets of finance within varied environments, including rapid growth companies, global Fortune 500 industrial companies and entertainment industry.
 | Richard G. Rawson | •Director since: 1989 •Age: 74 | ||||||
Mr. Rawson has been a key perspective on such matters that are increasingly important to the Company.
Houston in December 2020.
Mr. YoungRawson brings extensive financial and accountingoperational experience to the Board. His prior experience as a partner in an international accounting firm, as a senior financial officer of large companies, and hislengthy service on the audit committees of publicly traded companies provide Mr. Young with a thorough understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements. Additionally, Mr. Young’s prior experience provides a solid background for him to advise and consult with the Board on financial and audit-related matters as chairperson of the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee, and to serve as the designated audit committee financial
Summary of Committee Memberships
The following table summarizes the committees toof which each director will belong both before and after the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including after giving effect to the covenants set forth in the 2016 Agreement and assuming that each of the nominees for director at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are elected:
is currently a member:
(Term Expires) | Compensation Committee | |||||||||||||
| Finance, Risk Management & Audit Committee | Governance Committee | |||||||||||||
| Timothy Clifford* | I (2023) | C | l | |||||||||||
| l | ||||||||||||||
| l | C |
John Lumelleau†
| II (2024) | l$ | |||||||||||||
Ellen H. Masterson† | I (2023) | C $ | ||||||||||||
Randall Mehl† | III (2025) | l | ||||||||||||
l$ | ||||||||||||||
Latha Ramchand† | I (2023) | l$ | ||||||||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | III (2025) | |||||||||||||
Paul J. Sarvadi‡ | II (2024) |
| C | Committee Chair | * | Lead independent Director | ||||||||
| l | Committee Member | † | Independent Director | ||||||||
| $ | Audit committee financial expert | ‡ | Chairman of the | ||||||||
| Insperity | 11 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Director Independence
Under the rules of the NYSE, the Company must have a majority of independent directors.our directors must be independent. No director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). In evaluating each director’s independence, the Board considered all relevant facts and circumstances, and relationships and transactions between each director, her or his family members or any business, charity or other entity in which the director has an interest or a significant relationship on the one hand, and the Company, its affiliates, or the Company’sour senior management on the other. As a result of this review, at its meeting held onin February 19, 2016,2023, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the Company’s directors are independent, from the Company and its management, with the exception of Messrs.Mr. Sarvadi, and Rawson, bothwho is a member of whom are members of theour senior management, and Mr. Rawson, who was a member of our senior management until his retirement in May 2018, whose independence was not considered by the Company.Board.
The Board has considered what types of disclosure should be made relating to the process of determining director independence. To assist the Board in making disclosures regarding its determinations of independence, the Board has adopted categorical standards as contemplated under the listing standards of the NYSE then in effect. Under the rules then in effect, relationships that were within the categorical standards were not required to be disclosed and their impact on independence was not required to be separately discussed, although the categorical standards, by themselves, did not determine the independence of a particular director. The Board considers all
relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether a director is independent. A relationship satisfies the categorical standards adopted by the Board if it:
•is not a relationship that would preclude a determination of independence under Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual;
•is not required to be, and it is not otherwise, disclosed in this proxy statement.
In the course of the Board’s determination regarding the independence of those directors other than Messrs. Sarvadi and Rawson,under consideration, it considered all transactions, relationships and arrangements in which such directors and Insperitythe Company were participants. The Board also considered any transactions amongst the directors, even if they did not involve Insperity. In particular, with respectparticipants or deemed to each of the most recent three fiscal years, the Board evaluated, with respect to Dr. Jones, its long-time employment ofhave an individual who became Dr. Jones’ son-in-law. The Board has determined that this relationship is not material. In making this determination with respect to Dr. Jones, the Board considered that Dr. Jones’ son-in-law was employed as a manager of lead generation, held such position for several years prior to becoming a member of Dr. Jones’ family, and his salary was between the 25th and 75th percentile for the position.interest.
Selection of Nominees for the Board of Directors
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicitsmay solicit ideas for potential candidates for membership on the Board from a number of sources, including members of the Board, our executive officers, of the Company, individuals personally known to the members of the Board, research, and research.search firms. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has sole authority to select and compensate a third-party executive search firm to help identify candidates, ifas it deems advisable. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for the Board submitted by stockholders. Any such submissions should include the candidate’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be directed to theour Corporate Secretary of Insperity at 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not require the stockholder to submit any particular information regarding the qualifications of the stockholder’s candidate, the level of consideration that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will give to the stockholder’s candidate will be commensurate with the quality and quantity of
| Insperity | 12 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
information about the candidate that the stockholder makes available to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will considerevaluate all candidates identified through the processes described above and will evaluate each of them on the same basis.
In addition, the Bylaws of the Company permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual stockholders meeting whether or not such nominee is submitted to and evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. To nominateassessing a director using this process, the stockholder must follow the procedures described under “Additional Information — Stockholder Director Nominations for 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”
age. Generally, based on this initial evaluation, the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview the nominee,candidate and, if warranted, will recommend that one or more members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, other members of the Board, and senior management, as appropriate, interview the nominee in person or by telephone.candidate. After completing this evaluation and interview process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the fullentire Board as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
In addition, our Bylaws permit our stockholders to nominate individuals for election as directors at our annual stockholders meeting whether or not such nominee is submitted to and evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. To nominate an individual for election as a director using this process, a stockholder must follow the procedures described under “Additional Information— Stockholder Director Nominations and Proposals for 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders”.
Director Qualifications
The following are core criteria that are expected of each director or nominee:
•high integrity and ethical standards;
•skills and expertise that are complementary to the existing Board members’ skills;
•independence of thought and judgment;
•the ability to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to the performance of her or his duties, taking into consideration any service on other public company boards; and
•the ability to represent the interests of all of our stakeholders and not just one particular constituency.
In addition to these core criteria, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly assesses the areas of expertise that will promote an effective and high-functioning board and also considers other qualities that it may deem to be desirable, such as demonstrated business judgment, collaborative abilities, training and education, and relationships.
Below are the qualifications, skills, and expertise that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers critical to the Board’s ability to provide effective oversight of the Company and are directly relevant to our business, strategy and operations. Although a given director or director nominee need not individually possess the experience, skill, or other requisite qualification in all areas, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the Board, as a collective group, should have experience in such areas of expertise. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly conducts assessments of the areas of expertise possessed by the current members of the Board and the collective Board, which is considered when developing the desired profile in candidate searches.
The chart that follows illustrates how these qualifications and skills are distributed among our directors and nominees as a collective group.
•Senior Leadership experience as a CEO or as another senior officer demonstrates leadership ability, as well as a practical understanding of complex organizations, processes, corporate culture, and the methods to drive change and growth.
•Industry experience in human capital management, human resources, insurance services, small businesses, or entrepreneurial ventures provides a valuable perspective on the Company’s business strategy, operations, key performance metrics, risks, target markets, competition, and other issues specific to the Company’s business.
| Insperity | 13 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
•Strategic Planning experience with significant corporate initiatives is valuable in assessing specific plans to capitalize on identified growth opportunities and evaluating the Company’s capital structure and capital allocation.
•Sales & Marketing experience is critical to assisting the Board with oversight of matters relating to a large sales organization, brand development, marketing to businesses, and digital marketing.
•Audit & Financial Planning experience is key to providing oversight to the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting and to critically evaluating metrics that measure our performance.
•Risk Oversight experience contributes to identification, assessment, and prioritization of significant risks facing the Company and facilitates the Board’s role in providing oversight of the Company’s policies and procedures that are designed to manage those risks.
•Corporate Governance experience, including experience with governance principles or environmental, social, and governance initiatives such as sustainability and diversity, equity, and inclusion, is important to the Board’s understanding of best practices in corporate governance matters and enhancing board effectiveness, and supports the Board’s goals of accountability, transparency and protection of stockholder interests.
•Information, Analytics & Technology experience assists the Board with understanding and oversight of cloud-based, mission-critical solutions, as well as cybersecurity and data privacy matters.
•Service Operations experience is valuable in understanding the issues related to a large service organization that offers business process outsourcing solutions to its clients.
We provide additional information about the qualifications, skills, and expertise of each director in the biographies for the individual directors under “—Nominees for Director” and “—Directors Not Currently Subject to Election.”
| Insperity | 14 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Board of DirectorsDirectors’ Leadership
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines established the position of lead independent director in 2012.is established by our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. YoungClifford is currently the lead independent director. The Board reevaluates the lead independent director position annually. The lead independent director has the following responsibilities in addition to the regular duties of a director:
•prepare and set the agenda for and chair executive sessions of the outside directors;
•preside at all meetings of the Board where the Chairman of the Board is not present or has a potential conflict of interest;
•serve as liaison and facilitate communications between the independent directors and the Chairman of the Board and CEO;
•consult with the Chairman of the Board and CEO on matters relating to corporate governance and performance of the Board; and
•collaborate with the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee and with the rest of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on possible director conflicts of interest or breaches of the Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight
The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s overall risk profile and assisting management in addressing specific risks. The Company’sOur Enterprise Risk Management Steering Committee (the “ERM Steering Committee”) is responsible for formally identifying and evaluating risks that may affect the Company’sour ability to execute itsour corporate strategy and fulfill itsour business objectives. The ERM Steering Committee employs a disciplined approach to identifying, documenting, evaluating, communicating, and monitoring enterprise risk management within the Company. The ERM Steering Committee is chaired by the Company’s chief financial officer and includes the Company’s general counsel, internal audit director, and other members of management. The ERM Steering Committee reports to the Board and the CEO. The ERM Steering Committee conducts an annual comprehensive risk review of our overall risk profile and analyzes any significant identified risks, including consideration of risks relating to strategic, environmental, social, governance, health and safety, operational, financial, legal, regulatory, and reputational matters, which the ERM Steering Committee then presents and discusses with the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee and the entire Board. In addition to the formal annual review, members of the ERM Steering Committee review and provide periodic updates as appropriate regarding our overall risk profile and any significant identified risks to both the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee and the entire Board.
During 2015,2022, the ERM Steering Committee completed aits annual comprehensive review and update of the Company’s risks, including strategic, operational, financial, legal, regulatory and reputational risks. The ERM Steering Committee further reviewed and updated the mitigating factors associated with such risks, and prioritized the identified risks based upon the subjectively determined likelihood of the occurrence and the estimated resulting impact on the Company if the risk occurred. The ERM Steering Committee is charged with periodically reviewing the Company’s overall risk profile, as well as any significant identified risks, with both the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee and the entire Board.
| Insperity | 15 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
The Board executes its risk oversight function both directly and through its standing committees, each of which assists the Board in overseeing a part of the Company’s overall risk management. Throughout the year, the Board and each such committee spend a portion
of their time reviewing and discussing specific risk factors, and risk assessments are part of all major decision making. The Board is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversight and related activities through regular reports from such committees. Members of senior management also update the Board and the committees during the year as appropriate to address key risk-related matters, including legal and regulatory developments, the assessment and management of environmental and climate change risks, cybersecurity and data privacy risks, and diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee is assigned primary responsibility for oversight of risk assessment with financial implications.implications, as well as those that threaten the long-term sustainability of our business, such as risks associated with cybersecurity, data privacy, environmental (which would include climate change risks), health and safety, and social and governance matters. In its periodic meetings with management, internal auditors, and independent auditors, the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee reviews and monitors many factors relating to enterprise risk, including:
•the financial affairs of the Company;
•the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and internal controls;
•the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence, and performance;
•the performance of the personnel responsible for the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors; and
•the Company’s policies and procedures with respect to risk management.
The Compensation Committee has the primary responsibility to consider material risk factors relating to the Company’s compensation policies and practices.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors governance and succession risks.
As part of its review and approval of the Company’sour capital budget, compensation, major acquisitions, material contracts, compensation and other similar matters, the Board retains ultimate authority over assessing the risks and their impacts on the Company’sour business.
Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging of CompanyOur Common Stock
As of May 9, 2016,April 4, 2023, Mr. Sarvadi had 220,000120,000 shares of Common Stock pledged.our common stock pledged, which represented approximately 8.0% of the shares of our common stock Mr. Sarvadi beneficially owned. After a thorough review, the Board previously determinedapproved Mr. Sarvadi’s pledge of shares based on their determination that the number of shares pledged by the CEOhim were not significant. In making this determination, the Board considered that the pledged shares onlydid not represent approximately 14%a material portion of the total shares beneficially owned by the CEO and approximatelyhim, were less than 1% of the Company’sour total shares outstanding and market capitalization.capitalization, and also represented an amount that could reasonably be expected to be sold in an orderly manner in a short period of time given the Company’s historic average daily trading volume. The Board also considered the CEO’sMr. Sarvadi’s significant number of founder’s shares that were not earned as compensation from the Company, and his compliance with the Company’sour stock ownership guidelines disregarding(disregarding the pledged shares), and the purpose of his pledge being unrelated to an attempt to shift or hedge economic risk in owning Company shares.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) governing the conduct of the Company’sour directors, officers and employees. The Code, which meets the requirements of Rule 303A.10 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and Item 406 of Regulation S-K, is intended to promote honest and ethical conduct,conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and
| Insperity | 16 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
understandable disclosure in the Company’sour public filings,filings; compliance with lawslaws; and the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code. Our new employees are required to certify that they have reviewed and understand the Code. In addition, our annual compliance training for all employees reminds them of their obligations under the Code and provides practical examples to foster a deeper understanding of its principles. You can access the Code on the Company’sour website at www.insperity.com under the Corporate Governance heading in the Corporate Governance section under the Investor Relations tab. section. The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee has responsibility for oversight of compliance with Code. Changes in and waivers to the Code for the Company’sour directors, executive officers and certain senior financial officers will be posted on the Company’sour Internet website within four business days of being approved and will be maintained for at least 12 months. If you wish to raise a question or concern or report a violation, including anonymously, to the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee, you should visit www.ethicspoint.com (or https://insperity.navexone.com/ on a mobile device) or call the Ethicspoint toll-free reporting hotline at 1-866-384-4277.1-844-606-3529.
Stockholder Communications and Engagement
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with the entire Board or the non-management directors as a group by sending an email to directors@insperity.com. directors@insperity.com. Alternatively, you may mail your correspondence to the Board or non-management directors in care of the Corporate Secretary, 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339. In the subject line of the email or on the envelope, please specify whether the communication is addressed to the entire Board or to the non-management directors.
Unless any director directs otherwise, communications received (via U.S. mail or email) will be reviewed by theour Corporate Secretary who will exercise his discretion not to forward to the Board correspondence that is inappropriate such as business solicitations, frivolous communications and advertising, routine business matters (i.e.(i.e., business inquiries, complaints, or suggestions), and personal grievances.
In addition, members of management, including our Chairman of the Board and CEO, regularly meet with stockholders to review Company strategies, financial and operating performance, and other topics of interest. We share the feedback from these sessions with the Board to help ensure that both the Board and management understand and consider the issues that are important to our stockholders. Please also see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Stockholder Advisory Votes” for an additional discussion.
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors
Directors are expected to attend all or substantially all Board meetings and meetings of the Committees of the Board on which they serve. Directors are also expected to spend the necessary time to discharge their responsibilities appropriately (including advance review of meeting materials) and to ensure that other existing or future commitments do not materially interfere with their responsibilities as members of the Board. The Board met 13five times in 2015. All2022. During 2022, all of the members of the Board participated in more thanat least 75% of the meetings of the Board and Committees of which they were members during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.period of such director’s service. The Board encourages its members to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Last year, fivenine of the Company’sour directors attended the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors and the Lead Independent or Presiding Director
| Insperity | 17 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board has appointed three standing committees: the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The charters for each of the three standing committees,Committees, which have been adopted by the Board, contain a detailed description of the respective standing committee’s duties and responsibilities and are available on the Company’sour website at www.insperity.com under the Corporate Governance heading in the Corporate Governance section under the Investor Relations tab. The Board also created a new, temporary Independent Advisory Committee pursuant to the 2015 Agreement. section. The Board has reviewed the applicable legal and NYSE standards for independence for members of each of the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as well as the Company'sour independence standards for such Committees, and has determined that the members of each of those Committees of the Board is “independent” under such requirements.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met fivethree times in 2015.2022. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently are:are Ms. McKenna-Doyle,Kaufman, who serves as chairperson and Messrs. Brown, Feld and Young. The composition of this Committee was revised in connection with the 2016 Agreement. See “Proposal Number 1: Election of Directors —General — Agreements with Starboard — 2016 Agreement.”Mr. Clifford. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: (i)(1) identifies individuals qualified to become Board members, consistent with the criteria for selection approved by the Board; (ii)(2) recommends to the Board a slate of director nominees to be elected by the stockholders at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and, when appropriate, director appointees to take office between Annual Meetings of Stockholders; (iii)(3) develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines for the Company; and (iv)(4) oversees the evaluation of the Board.
Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee met eight times in 2015.2022. The members of thisthe Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee currently are Mr. Young,Ms. Masterson, who serves as chairperson, Ms. Kaufman, Ms. McKenna-Doyle and Mr. Sorensen. Pursuant to the 2016 Agreement, immediately following the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and assuming all director nominees are re-elected, the members of this Committee will be Mr. Young, who will continue to serve as chairperson, Ms. Kaufman,Lumelleau, Mr. Morphy, and Mr. Sorensen.Dr. Ramchand. The Board has determined that Mr. Youngeach member of the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the financial affairs, risk management, accounting and financial reporting processes, and audits of financial statements of the Company by reviewing and monitoring: (i)(1) the financial affairs of the Company; (ii)(2) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and internal controls; (iii)(3) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iv)(4) the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance; (v)(5) the performance of the personnel responsible for the Company’sour internal audit function and the independent auditors; and (vi) the Company’s(6) our policies and procedures with respect to risk management, as well as other matters that may come before it as directed by the Board.
the Company’s business, such as risks associated with cybersecurity, data privacy, environmental (which would include climate change risks), health and safety, social and governance matters. In connection with those responsibilities, the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee oversees the Company’s process of preparing its annual Corporate Social Responsibility report.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee met sixfive times in 2015.2022. The members of the Compensation Committee currently are Dr. Jones,Mr. Clifford, who serves as chairperson, Dr. Jones, Ms. Kaufman, and Messrs. Brown and Feld. Pursuant to the 2016 Agreement, immediately following the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and assuming all director nominees are re-elected, the members of this Committee will be Mr. Brown, who will serve as chairperson, Mr. Feld and Ms. McKenna-Doyle. In addition, the new independent director to be added to the Board pursuant to the 2016 Agreement would also become a member of this Committee.Mehl. The Compensation Committee: (i)(1) oversees and administers the Company’s compensation policies, plans and practices; (ii)(2) reviews and discusses with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by SEC Regulation S-K, Item 402;the rules of the SEC; and (iii)(3) prepares the annual report required by the rules of the SEC on executive compensation for inclusion in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K or proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. To carry out these purposes, the Compensation Committee: (i)(1) evaluates the performance of, and determines the compensation for, senior management,the CEO and, taking into consideration recommendations made by the CEO; (ii)CEO, our other executive officers; (2) administers the Company’sour compensation programs; and (iii)(3) performs such other duties as may from time to time be directed by the Board.
Pursuant to the terms of the Insperity, Inc. 20012012 Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2001 Incentive Plan”), and the Insperity, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan (the “2012 Incentive Plan” and, together with the 2001 Incentive Plan, the “Incentive Plans”), the Board or the Compensation Committee may delegate authority under the 2012 Incentive PlansPlan to the Chairman of the Board or a committee of one or more Board members, respectively, pursuant to such conditions and limitations as each may establish, except that neither may delegate to any person the authority to make awards, or take other action, under the 2012 Incentive PlansPlan with respect to participants who may be subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
| Insperity | 18 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
| Insperity | 19 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) explains our compensation philosophy, objectives, and strategies and the underlying elements of our compensation programs for the Company’sour named executive officers (“NEOs”). in 2022. This CD&A also summarizes decisions that the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (“Compensation Committee”) made regarding these programs and the factors considered in making those decisions.
The following individuals comprised our NEOs for 2015:
2022:
| Name | Title | |||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | |||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | Chief Financial Officer, | |||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | President and Chief Operating Officer | |||||
| Executive Vice President of Gross Profit Operations | ||||||
| Daniel D. Herink | ||||||
Financial Highlights
The Company’s financial performancecontinued strong execution of our leadership team and employees during 2022 in 2015 was strongspite of lingering pandemic conditions and continuedeconomic uncertainty allowed us to reflectincrease our commitment to unit growth in theaverage number of paid worksite employees (“WSEE”WSEEs”), effectively managing our pricing paid during 2022 by 17.7% and direct costs, controlling operating expenses and enhancing total return for our stockholders.to achieve a Company record-setting $352.3 million of adjusted EBITDA. This tremendous level of performance across the Company allowed us to pay record annual dividends of $2.01 per share.
| Insperity | 20 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Note: Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used by management to analyze the Company’s performance. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) plus tax reform bonuses, stock-based compensation and amortization of SaaS implementation costs. Please read Item 7.7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP—Non-GAAP Financial Measures”Measures,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152022 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023, our prior Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC on February 10, 2022, and our prior Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on February 12, 20162021 for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
* Excludes a special dividenddividends of $1.00 per share paid in the fourth quarter of 2017 and $2.00 per share paid in the fourth quarter of 2014.2021.
| Insperity | 21 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Our Pay-for-Performance Compensation Philosophy
philosophy as follows:
| Compensation Objective | How we accomplish our objectives | |||||||||||
| Attract, retain and motivate high performing individuals to achieve our annual and long-term business and strategic goals | • | |||||||||||
| • | ||||||||||||
| Maintain competitive base salaries that compensate employees based upon job responsibilities, level of experience, individual performance, comparisons to the market, internal comparisons and other relevant factors. | |||||||||||
| • | Provide a competitive benefits package. | ||||||||||
| • | Deliver the largest portion of executive compensation in the form of long-term incentives that vest over multiple years. | ||||||||||
| Motivate management to achieve short-term business goals and to enhance long-term stockholder value | • | Promote a performance-driven culture that encourages growth by recognizing and rewarding employees who meet and exceed our business objectives. | |||||||||
| • | Motivate and reward | ||||||||||
| • | Base a substantial portion of each NEO’s total compensation package on long-term incentive components and a variable annual compensation component (as outlined below). | ||||||||||
| • | |||||||||||
| • | Align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders through the use of stock ownership guidelines. | ||||||||||
| Discourage excessive risk-taking that could adversely impact stockholder value | • | Conduct an annual risk assessment of our executive compensation programs. | |||||||||
| • | |||||||||||
| • | Incorporate a | ||||||||||
Insperity’s Best Practice Features
We have embedded features in our overall compensation programs featuresthat are both aligned with the objectives of our business objectives and designed to strengthen the link between the interests of our executive officers and those of our stockholders. Following is a summary of practices related to compensation that we have adopted and pay practices that we avoid:
What Insperity Has
has:
| Compensation program emphasizing variable and at-risk compensation with at least 74% of each NEO’s target compensation tied to annual bonus and long-term incentives | ||||||
| a | Long-term incentive (“LTI”) program prioritizing performance-based LTI with 65% of the CEO’s and, on average, 46% of the other NEO’s LTI mix in performance-based LTI | |||||
| a | Stock ownership guidelines | |||||
| Clawback policy for incentive compensation paid to any employee, including NEOs and other executive officers | ||||||
| Minimum vesting period of | ||||||
| Double trigger requirement for | ||||||
| 22 | 2023 Proxy Statement | |||||||
| a | Hedging policy | |||||
| Pledging policy | ||||||
| Compensation Committee composed entirely of outside, independent directors | ||||||
| Independent compensation consultant hired by, and reporting directly to, the Compensation Committee | ||||||
What Insperity Does Not Have
does not have:
| Employment agreements with NEOs or other executive officers | ||||||
| Executive pension or other similar retirement or supplemental benefits | ||||||
| Single trigger change in control agreements for NEOs or other executive officers | ||||||
| Tax gross-ups in the event of a change in control | ||||||
| Medical coverage for retirees | ||||||
| Excessive benefits and perquisites | ||||||
Stockholder Advisory Votes
At our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation of our NEOs, with over 80% of the votes cast in favor of such compensation. The Company’s management conducted stockholder outreach following our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders regarding the say-on-pay advisory vote, and the feedback received was provided to the Compensation Committee for consideration as part of its ongoing evaluation of our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee values the opinions expressed by our stockholders and believes that our 2022 support level demonstrates a strong alignment of our compensation programs with stockholders’ interests.
2022 Executive Compensation Program
Summary of Compensation Elements
chart:
| Compensation Element | Form of Compensation | Purpose | |||||||||||
| Fixed | |||||||||||||
| Base Salary | Cash | Provides fixed level of compensation to attract and retain talent | |||||||||||
| Variable and | Variable Cash Compensation | Cash | Rewards executive officers for achieving annual Company | ||||||||||
| Long-Term Equity Incentives | Restricted Stock Units and Performance Shares | Supports long-term focus on creating stockholder value, | |||||||||||
| Benefits | |||||||||||||
| Retirement Benefits | 401(k) Plan | Provides competitive retirement benefits as part of comprehensive pay package | |||||||||||
| Health & Welfare Benefits | Medical, Dental, Life and Disability Benefits | Provides competitive health and welfare benefits as part of comprehensive pay package | |||||||||||
As illustrated in the charts below, approximately 87% of the CEO’s target direct compensation and 82% of all NEOs target direct compensation, on average, was in the form of incentive-based compensation.
| Insperity | 23 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Base Salary
Base salary is intended to provide fixed annual compensation to attract and retain talented executive officers. Annual adjustments to base salary are based upon thean annual performance evaluation, market data and other relevant considerations. Annual performance appraisals are completed through our talent management system, which evaluates
Our NEOs base salaries for 2022 were as follows:
| 2021 | 2022 | 2022 | |||||||||
| Base Salary | Base Salary | Changes | |||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | $1,082,000 | $1,125,000 | 4.0% | ||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Treasurer | $549,000 | $573,000 | 4.4% | ||||||||
| President and Chief Operating Officer | $660,000 | $690,000 | 4.5% | ||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Gross Profit Operations | $396,000 | $416,000 | 5.1% | ||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Legal, General Counsel and Secretary | $461,350 | $481,000 | 4.3% | ||||||||
The 2021 and 2022 base salaries were based on the executive officer’s annual performance based on pre-established competenciesevaluations, the findings of compensation studies conducted in late 2020 and 2021 by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), and other factors deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee, such as Company performance, general economic conditions and the achievement of specific individual performance goals. Competenciesdecision to forgo any increases for executive officers include business ethics, continuous learning, integrity, managing customer focus, strategic thinking and visionary leadership.2021.
Variable CashShort-Term Incentive Compensation
Variable cashshort-term incentive compensation places a significant portion of executive compensation at risk and is tied to corporate departmental and individual performance. Variable compensation for all executive officers is paid through the Insperity AnnualShort-Term Incentive Program, (“IAIP”), a non-equitycash incentive program under the stockholder-approved 2012 Incentive Plan. The IAIPShort-Term Incentive Program embodies our pay-for-performance philosophy and helps align executive officers’ compensation to the Company’s overall performance. In 2022, the Compensation Committee established the threshold, target and maximum payout opportunity for NEOs and other executive officers under the Short-Term Incentive Program at 25%, 100% and 200%, respectively.
| Insperity | 24 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
For 2022, the Compensation Committee set the annual incentive targets as a percentage of each NEO’s base salary as follows:
| 2022 Target Bonus Opportunity | |||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 150% | ||||
| Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Treasurer | 100% | ||||
| President and Chief Operating Officer | 125% | ||||
| Executive Vice President of Gross Profit Operations | 100% | ||||
| Executive Vice President of Legal, General Counsel and Secretary | 100% | ||||
Annual Bonus Metrics
The Compensation Committee selects corporate performance as well asgoals that align with the Company’s business strategy and objectives. The Compensation Committee sets each corporate performance goal to their respective individual performancebe challenging and rigorous, requiring the performanceattainment of predetermined achievement levels before triggering a payout to the executives. To continue the emphasis on improved unit growth and profitability, the Compensation Committee tied 100% of the departmentsNEOs’ Short-Term Incentive Program payout opportunity to growth in average WSEEs paid, adjusted EBITDAIC (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and incentive compensation), and growth in average gross profit per WSEE per month. Consistent with prior years, the Compensation Committee chose to exclude incentive compensation from adjusted EBITDA under their respective supervision.the Short-Term Incentive Program because any cash payout impacts adjusted EBITDA. For 2022, our annual bonus program was based 40% on adjusted EBITDAIC, 40% on growth in average WSEEs paid, and 20% on growth in average gross profit per WSEE per month.
| Annual Bonus Metric | Definition | Rationale | ||||||
| Adjusted EBITDAIC | In setting our adjusted EBITDAIC performance goal, the Compensation Committee chose to exclude specified items from EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), to the extent applicable, including for example, the following: (1) non-cash impairment charges; (2) stock-based and incentive compensation; (3) changes in statutory tax rates and assessments; (4) professional advisory fees and outside costs related to stockholder matters; and (5) other extraordinary, unusual or infrequent items. These adjustments are largely consistent with prior years. For 2022, adjusted EBITDAIC, the Compensation Committee only included the adjustment for incentive compensation. | We have included adjusted EBITDAIC as one of our corporate performance goals because we believe it is a key indicator of our overall productivity; effective management of pricing, direct costs and operating expenses; and ability to grow the business while favorably balancing profitability. | ||||||
| Growth in Average WSEEs Paid (“PWEE Growth”) | The PWEE Growth corporate component of the Short-Term Incentive Program bonuses was determined by calculating the year-over-year growth in the average number of WSEEs paid for calendar year 2022 and year-over-year growth as of January 2023 compared to January 2022, with the final payout amount being based upon the period that produced the greatest percentage payout of the target bonus. We included the number of WSEEs paid for January 2023 in the performance period to reflect the results of our annual Fall Sales Campaign and significant year-end client renewal period. The approach outlined above is consistent with prior years. | We included PWEE Growth as a component in order to focus our NEOs on growing our business. Increasing the average number of WSEEs paid is a key metric for measuring the success of our sales operations and client retention efforts and is a significant driver in our overall growth and performance. | ||||||
| Growth in Average Gross Profit per WSEE per Month (“GP per WSEE per Month”) | Gross profit from our PEO services and other products and services offerings expressed on a per WSEE per month basis. | We included this component because the margin on our PEO services and other products and services is an important driver of our overall profitability. | ||||||
2022 Short-Term Incentive Program Performance Results
The table below shows our financial metric component results versus our 2022 bonus targets. Our performance under the
| Insperity | 25 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Short-Term Incentive Program resulted in a maximum payout for the PWEE Growth, adjusted EBITDAIC and GP per WSEE per Month components.
| Metric | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDAIC (in millions)1 | PWEE Growth Percentage | GP per WSEE per Month | ||||||||||||
| Threshold | (25% Payout) | $277.5 | 14.5% | $253 | ||||||||||
| Threshold Plus | (50% Payout) | $298.75 | 15% | $258 | ||||||||||
| Target | (100% Payout) | $320 | 15.5% | $263 | ||||||||||
| Stretch | (150% Payout) | $343.25 | 16% | $268.5 | ||||||||||
| Maximum | (200% Payout) | $366.5 | 16.5% | $274 | ||||||||||
| Actual Calendar Year Results | $410 | 17.7% | $286 | |||||||||||
| Performance Modifier | 200% | 200% | 200% | |||||||||||
1Adjusted EBITDAIC under our Short-Term Incentive Program differs from the definition of adjusted EBITDA we disclose as a Non-GAAP financial measure in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures” of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. Under our Short-Term Incentive Program, adjusted EBITDAIC adjustments were limited to incentive compensation expense for 2022.
The executives received bonus payouts in the following amounts based on the weighting for each metric and performance against each objective.
| Executive | Target Bonus ($) | PWEE Growth Payout | Adjusted EBITDAIC Payout | GP per WSEE per Month | Bonus Payout (% of Target) | Actual Bonus Payout ($) | ||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | $1,677,578 | $1,342,062 | $1,342,062 | $671,030 | 200% | $3,355,154 | ||||||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Treasurer | $569,308 | $455,446 | $455,446 | $227,723 | 200% | $1,138,615 | ||||||||||||||
| President and Chief Operating Officer | $856,731 | $685,385 | $685,385 | $342,692 | 200% | $1,713,462 | ||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Gross Profit Operations | $412,923 | $330,338 | $330,338 | $165,170 | 200% | $825,846 | ||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Legal, General Counsel and Secretary | $477,923 | $382,338 | $382,338 | $191,170 | 200% | $955,846 | ||||||||||||||
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
Long-term equity incentives align the interests of theour executive officers with those of theour stockholders. We believe that long-term incentives enhance retention while rewarding executive officers for their service.achieving long-term performance goals and enhancing stockholder value. Long-term equity incentive awards are made under the stockholder-approved 2012 Incentive Plan. The objectives of the 2012 Incentive Plan are to:
•provide incentives to attract and retain persons with training, experience and ability to serve as an executive officer;
•promote the interests of the Company by encouraging executive officers to acquire or increase their equity interest in the Company;
•incent executive officers to achieve long-term performance goals and increase stockholder value;
•provide a means by which executive officers may develop a sense of proprietorship and personal involvement in the development and financial success of the Company; and
•encourage executive officers to remain with, and devote their best efforts to the business of, the Company, thereby advancing the interests of the Company and our stockholders.
| 26 | |||||||||
Long-Term Equity Awards Granted in 2022
In February 2022, the CEO presented to the Compensation Committee his recommendations for long-term incentive awards for the other executive officers. His recommendations as to the amount and form of awards to be granted were based on a number of factors, including, the importance of each executive officer’s role in the Company’s future business operations, equity pay practices of competitor companies, annual expense to the Company of equity awards and the Company’s own past practices in granting equity awards. The Compensation Committee then determined and approved the awards for our executive officers, including the CEO, based upon the above noted factors. In light of the Company’s meaningful increase in stock price during 2021 (increased over 45%) and strong financial performance, the Compensation Committee approved an approximate 12% increase in the 2022 LTI grant value for the CEO.
| Executive | Total LTI Grant Date Value | Restricted Stock Units | Performance Shares under LTIP | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighting | Shares Granted | Grant Date Value | Weighting | Shares Granted | Grant Date Value | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | $6,194,009 | 35% | 23,345 | $2,099,883 | 65% | 43,355 | $4,094,126 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Treasurer | $1,278,348 | 55% | 7,645 | $687,668 | 45% | 6,255 | $590,680 | |||||||||||||||||||
| President and Chief Operating Officer | $1,742,424 | 50% | 9,450 | $850,028 | 50% | 9,450 | $892,396 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Gross Profit Operations | $971,641 | 55% | 5,810 | $522,610 | 45% | 4,755 | $449,031 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Legal, General Counsel and Secretary | $971,641 | 55% | 5,810 | $522,610 | 45% | 4,755 | $449,031 | |||||||||||||||||||
Awards granted to NEOs under the 2012 Incentive Plan may be in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, phantom shares, performance shares or units, bonus stock or other incentive awards. In recent years, including 2015, incentive awards have been made in the form of restricted stock or performance shares rather than stock options, as we believe the current accounting treatment of these award types more closely reflects the economic value of the award to the employees.
termination” within a prescribed number of months following a change in control. All outstanding equity awards held by NEOs include the double trigger requirement.
All equity grants to executive officers are approved solely by the Compensation Committee or the independent directors at regularly scheduled meetings, or in limited cases involving key recruits or promotions, by a special committee, special meeting, or unanimous written consent.Committee. If an award is made at a meeting of the Compensation Committee, the grant date is the meeting date or a fixed, future date specified at the time of the grant, such as the first business day of a subsequent calendar month or the date that the grant recipient commences employment. If an award is approved by unanimous written consent, the grant date is a fixed, future date on or after the date the consent is effective under applicable corporate law (or, if later, the date the grant recipient starts employment). Restricted stockgrant. RSUs and performance awards are valued in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ForCompensation.
2022 Restricted Stock Units
The 2022 RSUs granted are all subject to a three-year ratable annual vesting schedule, accrue dividend equivalents payable in additional shares of our common stock options,at the exercise price cannot be less thantime of vesting, and all NEO grants include a “double trigger” requirement in the closing pricecase of Common Stocka “change in control” of the Company. The 2022 RSUs are subject to the Company’s Qualified Retirement Policy whereby time-vested RSUs will continue vesting in accordance with an awards original vesting schedule provided the NEO’s last date of employment is at least six (6) months after the date of grant, the NEO has attained age 62 with at least 15 years of continuous service, the NEO provides the Company with six (6) months advance notice of retirement, the NEO continues to work full-time during such six (6) month period, and the NEO signs a waiver and release of claims. In addition, in order to avoid forfeiting the unvested RSUs, a retired NEO must refrain from providing any services, including but not limited to, as an employee, director, advisor, or independent contractor, to a business engaged in providing any services offered by the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates at the time of the NEO’s retirement, including but not limited to PEO services, payroll services, retirement services, or insurances services.
2022 Performance Share Awards under the Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”)
In evaluating the structure of the 2022 LTIP Awards, the Compensation Committee considered information provided by
| Insperity | 27 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
FW Cook on market design trends and examined payouts under the adjusted EBITDA component of prior LTIP awards. The Compensation Committee established at grant of the 2022 LTIP Awards set growth percentages for achieving threshold, target and maximum performance levels based on the grant dateactual end of the prior year adjusted EBITDA obtained in year one and stock options may not be re-priced or exchangedtwo of the three-year performance cycle. The Compensation Committee believed that this structure aligned with our stockholder’s long-term interests and incentivized the NEOs and other executive officers for the duration of the LTIP award by eliminating unnecessary volatility in multi-year forecasts while still establishing challenging long-term performance goal metrics. The Compensation Committee decided to assign a weighting for the components of the 2022 LTIP Awards at 75% adjusted EBITDA and 25% relative total shareholder return (“RTSR”). The table below outlines the metrics used in our 2022 performance share awards under the LTIP, and the rationale for each metric.
| Performance Share Metric | Definition | Rationale | ||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA (75% weighting) | EBITDA is adjusted for non-cash impairment charges, stock-based compensation expense, professional advisory fees for stockholder matters, litigation settlements and the associated legal fees, executive severance arrangements and changes in statutory tax rates and assessments. EBITDA may also be adjusted to exclude extraordinary or unusual items such as: nonrecurring gains or losses and the impact of any divestitures, acquisitions or change in accounting pronouncement that occurs during the performance period. These adjustments are largely consistent with prior years. The adjusted EBITDA portion of the 2022 LTIP Awards is measured under a three-year performance period (2022-2024) consisting of three one-year performance periods, with each calendar year being equally weighted for one-third of the target opportunity. | The Compensation Committee elected to use adjusted EBITDA as a performance metric because it is a key indicator of our: (1) overall productivity; (2) effective management of pricing, direct costs and operating expenses; and (3) ability to grow the business while favorably balancing profitability. | ||||||
| Relative TSR (RTSR) (25% weighting) | RTSR will be measured over the entire 2022-2024 performance period against the performance of 15 peer companies that the Compensation Committee designated as the Company’s 2022 compensation peer group. | The Compensation Committee elected to use RTSR as a performance metric to further align the long-term financial interests of the executive officers and the Company’s stockholders. | ||||||
Recipients can earn 50% of the target number of performance shares if the threshold performance level is achieved and can earn up to 200% of the target number of performance shares if the maximum performance level is achieved. If the performance metric for a cash buy-out or settlementperformance period falls below the threshold level, no performance shares will be credited for the performance period. If actual performance results fall between the threshold, target and maximum performance levels, the number of performance shares earned will be determined by interpolation between the applicable performance levels. For the RTSR component, the 2022 LTIP Awards are structured to cap the payout at 100% of target in the event the Company’s absolute TSR over the performance period is negative, and the payout opportunity is based on the Company’s percentile TSR ranking compared the peer group. Please see “— 2020 LTIP Awards” later in this CD&A for additional RTSR information.
Except in the case of a qualifying termination in connection with a lower exercisechange in control, or a termination due to retirement under the Company’s Qualified Retirement Policy, death or disability, a participant in the LTIP must be continuously employed by the Company or its subsidiaries throughout the entire three-year performance period and on the date such award is paid after the conclusion of the performance period to receive a payout of an award. The LTIP awards are payable in shares of our common stock and include dividend equivalents, payable in additional shares of our common stock, with respect to the number of performance shares actually earned pursuant to the LTIP awards if and to the extent dividends are paid on our common stock during the performance period.
Under the Qualified Retirement Policy, portions of the 2022 LTIP Awards may continue to vest provided the NEO’s last date of employment is at least six months after the date of grant, the NEO has attained age 62 with at least 15 years of continuous service, the NEO provides the Company with six months advance notice of retirement, the NEO continues to work full-time during such six (6) month period, and the NEO signs a waiver and release of claims. In addition, in order to
| Insperity | 28 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
avoid forfeiting any outstanding LTIP Awards, a retired NEO must refrain from providing any services, including but not limited to, as an employee, director, advisor, or independent contractor, to a business engaged in providing any services offered by the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates at the time of the NEO’s retirement, including but not limited to PEO services, payroll services, retirement services, or insurances services. Any payout under the 2022 LTIP Awards is further limited to a pro-rata amount for the portion of the performance period during which the NEO provided services and based upon actual performance results certified by the Compensation Committee. For any open performance period that begins after the NEO’s last day of employment, that portion of the LTIP award is forfeited.
The performance objectives and payout percentages for the portion of the first year of the 2022 LTIP Awards subject to the achievement of the adjusted EBITDA performance metric was as follows:
| Performance Level | 2022 Adjusted EBITDA Performance Objective (in millions) | Payout Percentage | ||||||
| Below Threshold | Less Than $250.75 | 0% | ||||||
| Threshold | $250.75 | 50% | ||||||
| Target | $281 | 100% | ||||||
| Maximum | $311 | 200% | ||||||
For purposes of the 2022 LTIP Awards, the Compensation Committee certified adjusted EBITDA of $352.3 million for the 2022 performance period. The Compensation Committee determined the LTIP performance modifier to be 200% for the first one-third tranche of the 2022 LTIP Award attributed to adjusted EBITDA.
2021 LTIP Awards
The performance objectives and payout percentages for the portion of the second year of the 2021 LTIP Awards subject to the achievement of the adjusted EBITDA performance metric was as follows:
| Performance Level | 2022 Adjusted EBITDA Performance Objective (in millions) | Payout Percentage | ||||||
| Below Threshold | Less Than $268 | 0% | ||||||
| Threshold | $268 | 50% | ||||||
| Target | $280 | 100% | ||||||
| Maximum | $293 | 200% | ||||||
For purposes of the 2021 LTIP Awards, the Compensation Committee certified adjusted EBITDA of $352.3 million for the 2022 performance period. The Compensation Committee determined the LTIP performance modifier to be 200% for the second one-third tranche of the 2021 LTIP Award attributed to adjusted EBITDA.
2020 LTIP Awards
In February 2020, the Compensation Committee granted awards under the LTIP (the “2020 LTIP Awards”) to the NEOs and certain other officers. The 2020 LTIP Awards are weighted at 75% for the adjusted EBITDA component and 25% for the RTSR component. Adjusted EBITDA is subject to a three-year performance period, 2020-2022, with each year being equally weighted for one-third of the target opportunity, while RTSR is measured over the entire 2020-2022 performance period.
For the 2020 LTIP Awards, the Compensation Committee elected to use increasing levels of EBITDA, with certain pre-defined adjustments expressed as a fixed dollar amount at grant, as the performance metric, because it is a key indicator of our: (1) overall productivity; (2) effective management of pricing, direct costs and operating expenses; and (3) ability to grow the business while favorably balancing profitability. For the 2022 performance period, adjusted EBITDA for the 2020 LTIP Awards was generally subject to the same adjustments as the 2022 LTIP Awards. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure (for additional information, please see the discussion of Adjusted EBITDA under “— Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation — Long-Term Equity Awards Granted in 2022”).
| Insperity | 29 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
For RTSR, the Compensation Committee elected to measure the Company’s performance against the performance of 15 companies1 the Compensation Committee designated as the 2020 compensation peer group. To mitigate the impact of one day’s trading activity, the beginning and ending stock price without prior stockholder approval.for each peer company is determined using a 20-day average closing stock price for the first day and last day of the performance period. If the Company’s absolute TSR over the performance period is negative, the payout percentage is capped at 100% of target performance shares granted, regardless of the Company’s RTSR positioning.
The 2020 LTIP Awards are payable in shares of our common stock and include dividend equivalents, payable in additional shares of our common stock, with respect to the number of performance shares actually earned pursuant to the 2020 LTIP Awards if and to the extent dividends are paid on our common stock during the performance period.
The table below outlines the adjusted EBITDA performance achieved for each of the three performance periods within the 2020 LTIP Awards:
Performance Period (in millions) | Adjusted EBITDA Goals | Actual Results | Vesting Percentage | ||||||||||||||
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
| 2020 | $250 | $261 | $287 | $288.6 | 200% | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | $263 | $287 | $330 | $254.9 | 0% | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | $276 | $316 | $380 | $352.3 | 157% | ||||||||||||
For the 2020 to 2022 performance period, the Company’s RTSR performance placed the Company at the 71st percentile compared to the performance of the companies included in the 2020 compensation peer group. Based upon this level of performance, the RTSR component of the 2020 LTIP Awards vested at 142%, as set forth in the table below:
| Relative Total Shareholder Return (RTSR) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020-2022 Performance Period | 25th Percentile or Better | 50th Percentile or Better | 75th Percentile or Better | 90th Percentile or Better | Actual Percentile Achieved | Vesting Percentage | ||||||||||||||
| Payout as a Percentage of Target | 50% | 100% | 150% | 200% | 71st Percentile | 142% | ||||||||||||||
Based upon the adjusted EBITDA and RTSR vesting percentages above, the executives received payouts for the 2020 LTIP as summarized below:
| Executive | 2020 Target # of PSUs | PSU Payout Multiplier | 2020 Earned Amounts | ||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 48,315 | 124.8% | 60,274 | ||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Treasurer | 7,360 | 124.8% | 9,182 | ||||||||
| President and Chief Operating Officer | 11,890 | 124.8% | 14,835 | ||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Gross Profit Operations | 6,020 | 124.8% | 7,511 | ||||||||
| Executive Vice President of Legal, General Counsel and Secretary | 6,020 | 124.8% | 7,511 | ||||||||
Other Compensation Elements
Retirement Benefits
We do not provide pension arrangements or nonqualified defined contribution or other deferred compensation plans for our executive officers. Our executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s corporate 401(k) plan. EachFor payroll period,periods in 2022, we contributecontributed on behalf of each eligible participant a matching contribution equal to 50%100% of the first 6% of compensation contributed to the 401(k) plan by the participant (subject to applicable limitations under the
1 The Compensation Committee originally selected 16 peer group companies; however, one company was eliminated due to a merger/acquisition prior to the start of the 2020 year.
| Insperity | 30 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Internal Revenue Code). Effective January 1, 2016, the matching contribution increased to 100% of the first 6% of compensation contributed for all participating employees.
Supplemental Benefits, Including Management Perquisites
Executive compensation also includes supplemental benefits and a limited number of perquisites that enhance our ability to attract and retain talented executive officers. We believe that perquisites assist in the operation of business, allowing executive officers more time to focus on business objectives. Supplemental benefits and perquisites include the following:
Role of Management in Setting Compensation
The recommendations of the CEO play a significant role in the Compensation Committee’s determination of compensation matters related to the executive officers reportingother NEOs, each of whom report directly to the CEO. On an annual basis, the CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding such components as salary adjustments, target annual incentive opportunities and the value of long-term incentive awards. In making his recommendations, the CEO reviews the performance of each of ourthe other executive officersNEOs based upon the core competencies of business ethics, continuous learning, integrity, managing customer focus, business acumen, strategic thinking and visionary leadership, market data for similar positions and other factors deemed relevant in reviewing each executive officer’s performance. The Compensation Committee takes the CEO’s recommendation under advisement, but makes all final decisions regarding such individual’seach NEO’s compensation. The CEO does not make a recommendation with respect to his own compensation. OurThe CEO typically attends Compensation Committee meetings, but hethe CEO is excused from any meeting when the Compensation Committee deems it advisable to meetdiscusses the CEO’s compensation. Additionally, the Compensation Committee regularly meets in executive session, or whenwithout the Compensation Committee meets to discuss items that would impactpresence of the CEO’s compensation. OurCEO. The CEO’s compensation is reviewed and discussed by the Compensation Committee and his performance is evaluated at least annually. The Compensation Committee makes all final compensation decisions for each of our executive officers,NEOs, including the CEO.
Role of the Compensation Committee in Setting Compensation
The Compensation Committee is responsible for designing, implementing and administering our executive compensation programs and, in doing so, the Compensation Committee is guided by the compensation philosophy stated above. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves total compensation for our executive officersNEOs through a comprehensive process that includes:
•selecting and engaging an external, independent consultant;
•reviewing market data on all components of compensation for each executive officer for the previous three years. Tally sheets included dollar values for the three previous years’ salary, cash incentive awards, perquisites (cash and in-kind), long-term stock-based awards, benefits and dividends paid on unvested long-term stock-based awards. Tally sheets were used to assist the Compensation Committee in determining current compensation decisions in viewmajor elements of executive officers’ historicalcompensation;
•reviewing alignment of executive compensation and cumulative pay.incentive goals with stockholder value; and
•reviewing performance results against corporate goals.
A complete listing of our Compensation Committee’s responsibilities is included in the Compensation Committee’s charter, which is available for review on our corporate website at www.insperity.com under the Corporate Governance heading in the Corporate Governance section under the Investor Relations tab. section.
Role of the Compensation Consultants in the Compensation Process
The Compensation Committee’s charter provides that it has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation
| Insperity | 31 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
consultant to assist in maintaining compensation practices in alignment with our compensation goals. The Compensation Committee believes that outside consultants are an efficient way to keep current on executive compensation trends and stay abreast of competitive compensation practices. TheFor 2022, the Compensation Committee retained FW Cook as its compensation consultant. FW Cook has periodically engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”) to conduct executive compensation studies and engaged Meridian Compensation Partners LLC (“Meridian”) for the first time in August 2015 for similar purposes. Neither PM&P nor Meridiannot received any remuneration from the Company, directly or indirectly, other than for advisory services rendered to, or at the direction of, the Compensation Committee or the Board. The Compensation Committee has reviewed PM&P’sFW Cook’s independence and determined that PM&P is an independent advisor with no conflicts of interest with us (as determined under Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) of the Exchange Act). The Compensation Committee has also reviewed Meridian’s independence and determined that MeridianFW Cook is an independent advisor with no conflicts of interest with us (as determined under Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) of the Exchange Act).
Assessing External Market Compensation Practices
At the direction of the Compensation Committee, we periodicallyannually conduct an executive compensation study that compares each executive officer’s compensation to market data for similar positions. The Compensation Committee determines whether the study is to be performed internally by Insperity or by an outside consulting firm that is directly engaged by the Compensation Committee. While the Compensation Committee does not target our executives’executive officers’ pay to any particular level (such as a target percentile) of comparative market data contained in executive compensation studies, such data help to inform and influence pay decisions and are considered by the Compensation Committee in meeting our compensation program objectives as described above.
Selecting a peer group to benchmark compensation for our executivesexecutive officers presents certain challenges, including the limited number of publicly-traded PEOs and the Company’s uniquespecific business model. As one of the largest PEO service providers in the United States, our direct PEO service competitors include TriNet Group, Inc., a national PEO, and the PEO divisions of Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Paychex, Inc., which are significantly larger business service companies. The delivery of our PEO services and strategicour other business unit servicesperformance solutions requires a variety of professional services, human resources, information technology services and software. These areas represent important components of our overall service offerings, and we compete for talent with many companies offering similar services or products. Our peer group includes a number of these companies. Consistent with our historical position, the Company does not view traditional staffing companies as competitors for business or talent and has not included such companies in our compensation peer group. We do not provide leased employees or staffing employees to clients, and in 2010 incurred significant expense and undertook significant re-branding efforts to change our name to Insperity in part to avoid any confusion with traditional staffing companies.
Compensation Peer Group took into account multiple factors, including: industry (with an emphasis on outsourced human resources services, including theour PEO competitors, of the Company)and information technology services), comparable revenue range, comparability in terms of complexity and business risk, andcomparable market capitalization, the extent to which each company may compete with Insperity for executive talent. Thetalent, peer groups of our PEO peers and peers selected by certain firms who provide proxy advisory services. For setting 2022 compensation, after reviewing the peer group with FW Cook, the Compensation Peer Group is periodically reviewed and may be modified based on these and other relevant criteria.Committee determined that no changes or additions to the peer group were necessary. For 2015,2022, the Compensation Peer Group included the following companies:
| Company Name | Company Ticker | |||||||||||
| Providers of PEO Services | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | ADP | ||||||||||
| Paychex, Inc. | PAYX | |||||||||||
| TriNet Group, Inc. | TNET | |||||||||||
| IT Services and Software | ||||||||||||
| ASGN Incorporated | ||||||||||||
| Korn Ferry | KFY | |||||||||||
| •the executive officer’s performance review conducted by either | |||
| 2014 | 2015 | 2015 | |||
| Base Salary | Base Salary | Increase | |||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | $850,000 | $850,000 | — | ||
| Chief Financial Officer, SVP of Finance and Treasurer | $396,000 | $408,000 | 3.0% | ||
| President | $482,000 | $494,000 | 2.5% | ||
| Chief Operating Officer and EVP of Client Services | $482,000 | $494,000 | 2.5% | ||
| EVP of Sales & Marketing | $460,000 | $472,000 | 2.6% | ||
officers);
| Corporate Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||
| OI | PWEE Growth | OEM | Departmental | Individual | ||||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 32 | % | 32 | % | 16 | % | 0 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer, SVP of Finance and Treasurer | 20 | % | 20 | % | 10 | % | 30 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||
| President | 24 | % | 24 | % | 12 | % | 20 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||
| Chief Operating Officer and EVP of Client Services | 24 | % | 24 | % | 12 | % | 20 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||
| EVP of Sales & Marketing | 24 | % | 24 | % | 12 | % | 20 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||
| 32 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| PWEE Growth Metric 1 | ||||||||||
Performance Level | Q1 Year-over-Year Growth Percentage | Q2 Year-over-Year Growth Percentage | Q3 Year-over-Year Growth Percentage | Q4 Year-over-Year Growth Percentage | PWEE Growth Corporate Performance Modifier | |||||
| Threshold | 8.7% | 9.3% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 50% | |||||
| Target | 9.7% | 10.3% | 10.6% | 10.6% | 100% | |||||
| Stretch | 10.7% | 11.3% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 125% | |||||
| Maximum | 11.6% | 12.4% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 150% | |||||
| PWEE Growth Metric 2 | ||||
| Performance Level | Calendar Year Year-over-Year Growth Percentage | PWEE Growth Corporate Performance Modifier | ||
| Threshold | 9.0% | 50% | ||
| Target | 10.0% | 100% | ||
| Stretch | 12.0% | 125% | ||
| Maximum | 14.0% | 150% | ||
| PWEE Growth Metric 3 | ||||
| Performance Level | January 31, 2016 Year-over-Year Growth Percentage | PWEE Growth Corporate Performance Modifier | ||
| Threshold | 9.0% | 50% | ||
| Target | 10.0% | 100% | ||
| Stretch | 12.0% | 125% | ||
| Maximum | 14.0% | 150% | ||
•the CEO presentedimportance of the executive officer’s position to the Compensation Committee his recommendations for awards of restricted stock forCompany in relation to the other executive officers. His recommendations as toofficer positions within the amount of awards to be granted were based on a number of factors, including, the importance of each executive officer’s role in the Company’s future business operations, equity pay practices of competitor companies, annual expense to the Company of equity awards and the Company’s own past practices in granting equity awards. The Compensation Committee then determined and approved the awards for the executive officers, including the CEO, based upon the above noted factors. For 2015, NEOs were granted the following restricted stock awards:Company.
| Name | Shares of Restricted Stock | Grant Date Value of Restricted Stock1 | |||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | 20,400 | $1,051,416 | |||
| Douglas S. Sharp | 8,000 | $412,320 | |||
| Richard G. Rawson | 14,000 | $721,560 | |||
| A. Steve Arizpe | 14,000 | $721,560 | |||
| Jay E. Mincks | 14,000 | $721,560 | |||
Aggregate Number of Performance Shares (at Target) | Grant Date Value of Performance Shares1 (at Target) | ||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 30,350 | $1,602,480 | |||||
| Chief Financial Officer, SVP of Finance and Treasurer | 5,300 | $279,840 | |||||
| President | 11,350 | $599,280 | |||||
| Chief Operating Officer and EVP of Client Services | 11,350 | $599,280 | |||||
| EVP of Sales & Marketing | 11,350 | $599,280 | |||||
| Performance Level | 2015 EBITDA Performance Objective (in millions) | Payout Percentage | ||
| Below Threshold | Less Than $101 | 0% | ||
| Threshold | $101 | 50% | ||
| Target | $103 | 100% | ||
| Maximum | $118 | 200% | ||
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To further align the interests of the CEOour NEOs and non-employee directors with those of our stockholders, the Board haswe have adopted stock ownership guidelines for the Company.guidelines. The stock ownership guidelines provide that the CEO is required to own threefive times his annual base salary in Common Stockour common stock and all non-employee directors are required to own threefive times their annual cash retainer in Common Stock.our common stock. The other executive officers are required to own three times or one and one-half times annual base salary in our common stock, depending on the executive tier level established by the Compensation Committee. Stock ownership includes direct stock ownership but does not include unvested stockperformance awards or unexercised stock options. The Company annually monitors and calculates the stock ownership level of each individual, and each individual has five years to meet the applicable ownership requirements. The CEO isand other executive officers are in compliance and each non-employee director is in compliance or is expected to be in compliance within the applicable time period.
Employment Agreements, Post-EmploymentSeverance and Change in Control Compensation
Our executive officers are employed at will and none have an employment agreement.
We maintain an executive severance plan for our NEOs and other executive officers that provides severance benefits if the participating executive is involuntarily terminated, or in the event of a change in control, is involuntarily terminated or terminates for good reason (as defined in the Plan) within a specified period of time after the change in control. In 2015, no NEOs departed from the Company. We do not provideexchange for being covered under the executive severance plan, each NEO was presented with a participation agreement and required to agree to certain restrictive covenants in favor of the Company, including a twenty-four (24) month non-compete for the CEO, an eighteen (18) month non-compete for the other NEOs, and a twenty-four (24) month non-solicitation of customers and non-solicitation of employees. In addition, the payment of severance benefits is subject to the NEO entering into a general release of claims with the Company upon termination of employment. There were no benefits paid under the severance plan to NEOs or other executive officers with any kind of contractual severance. during 2022.
Equity awards granted to executive officers do not automatically accelerate upon a change in control. Rather such awards contain a “double trigger” requiring a qualifying termination within a prescribed number of months following the change in control in order to accelerate vesting. All outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs are subject to the double trigger requirement.
These arrangements are discussed in more detail under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy (“Clawback Policy”)
Risk Assessment
The Company conducted an assessment of our compensation programs and practices for its employees and determined that there are no risks arising from such compensation programs and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In arriving at this determination, some of the key risk mitigators included independent review by departments not participating in the compensation program, internal audit review, maintenance of a whistleblower line, and external auditor review.
| Insperity | 33 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a $1 million limit on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation paid to the Company’sits principal executive officer, orprincipal financial officer, and any of the Company’sits three other most highly compensated executive officers employed as offor the end of thetaxable year (other than the principal executive officer or the principal financial officer) (collectively the “covered employees”). This limitation does not applyThe group of covered employees also includes an employee once considered a covered employee who continues to receive compensation thatfrom the Company (even though the employee is paid only if the executive officer’s performance meets pre-established objective goals based on performance criteria approved by stockholders. no longer a covered employee).
We strive to take action, where possible and considered appropriate, to preserve the deductibility of compensation paid to the Company’sour executive officers. The Company does not have any compensation covered by grandfathered arrangements, therefore compensation paid to our expanded group of covered employees will be subject to a $1 million annual deduction limitation. Although the deductibility of compensation is a consideration evaluated by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee believes that the lost deduction on compensation payable in excess of the $1 million limitation is not material relative to the benefit of being able to attract and retain talented management. We have also awarded compensation that might not be fully tax deductible when such grants were nonetheless in the best interest of the Company and itsour stockholders. SubjectAccordingly, the Compensation Committee will continue to retain the requirements of Section 162(m), the Company generally will be entitleddiscretion to take tax deductions relating topay compensation that is performance-based, which may include cash incentives, stock options and other performance-based awards.subject to the $1 million deductibility limit.
Compensation Committee Report
We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement with management. Based on such review, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for filing with the SEC.
The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who are members of the Compensation Committee:
| COMPENSATION COMMITTEE | |||||
| Timothy T. Clifford, Chairperson | |||||
| Eli Jones | |||||
| Carol R. Kaufman | |||||
| Randall Mehl | |||||
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2015,2022, among our current directors, Mr. Clifford, Dr. Jones, Ms. Kaufman and Messrs. Brown and FeldMr. Mehl served on the Compensation Committee. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is currently or has been at any time one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board or the Compensation Committee.
| Insperity | 34 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by the Company’s CEO, chief financial officer and each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company for services rendered in all capacities to the Company during 2015, 2014 and 2013. The Company hasfor each year in the prior three years that such individual was a NEO. We have not entered into any employment agreements with any of theour NEOs.
The compensation plans under which the grants in the following tables were made are generally described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, and include the IAIP, a non-equity incentive plan, the 2001Short-Term Incentive PlanProgram and the 2012 Incentive Plan, which provide for, among other things, restricted stock unit grants, performance restricted stock unit grants, and LTIP performance awards.
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Stock Awards ($)1 | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)2 | All Other Compensation ($)3 | Total ($) | |||||||||
Paul J. Sarvadi, CEO and Chairman of the Board | 2015 | 850,000 | 2,653,896 | 1,657,500 | 240,522 | 5,401,918 | |||||||||
| 2014 | 850,000 | 1,096,000 | 988,637 | 497,445 | 3,432,082 | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 816,300 | 1,167,600 | 283,815 | 570,406 | 2,838,121 | ||||||||||
Douglas S. Sharp, CFO, SVP of Finance and Treasurer | 2015 | 408,000 | 692,160 | 455,705 | 78,204 | 1,634,069 | |||||||||
| 2014 | 396,000 | 383,600 | 331,572 | 124,805 | 1,235,977 | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 378,000 | 408,660 | 181,352 | 79,018 | 1,047,030 | ||||||||||
Richard G. Rawson, President | 2015 | 494,000 | 1,320,840 | 678,188 | 109,064 | 2,602,092 | |||||||||
| 2014 | 482,000 | 657,600 | 464,087 | 237,696 | 1,841,383 | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 464,000 | 700,560 | 220,948 | 159,464 | 1,544,972 | ||||||||||
A. Steve Arizpe, COO and EVP of Client Services | 2015 | 494,000 | 1,320,840 | 672,282 | 113,514 | 2,600,636 | |||||||||
| 2014 | 482,000 | 657,600 | 467,921 | 224,498 | 1,832,019 | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 464,000 | 700,560 | 208,059 | 126,649 | 1,499,268 | ||||||||||
Jay E. Mincks, EVP of Sales & Marketing | 2015 | 472,000 | 1,320,840 | 615,902 | 81,965 | 2,490,707 | |||||||||
| 2014 | 460,000 | 657,600 | 437,296 | 211,367 | 1,766,263 | ||||||||||
| 2013 | 442,000 | 700,560 | 173,570 | 107,908 | 1,424,038 | ||||||||||
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)1 | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)2 | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)3 | All Other Compensation ($)4 | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||
Paul J. Sarvadi, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 2022 | 1,125,000 | — | 6,194,009 | 3,355,154 | 26,217 | 10,700,380 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 1,082,000 | — | 5,533,922 | 2,986,320 | 21,912 | 9,624,154 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 1,117,461 | — | 7,731,542 | 670,477 | 41,858 | 9,561,338 | |||||||||||||||||
Douglas S. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Finance and Treasurer | 2022 | 573,000 | — | 1,278,348 | 1,138,615 | 92,428 | 3,082,391 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 549,000 | — | 1,296,620 | 909,144 | 38,252 | 2,793,016 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 565,308 | 148,230 | 1,862,091 | 356,144 | 67,180 | 2,998,953 | |||||||||||||||||
A. Steve Arizpe, President and Chief Operating Officer | 2022 | 690,000 | — | 1,742,424 | 1,713,462 | 105,286 | 4,251,172 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 660,000 | — | 1,771,181 | 1,457,280 | 43,898 | 3,932,359 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 681,539 | 158,400 | 2,979,508 | 490,708 | 75,511 | 4,385,666 | |||||||||||||||||
James D. Allison, Executive Vice President of Gross Profit Operations | 2022 | 416,000 | — | 971,641 | 825,846 | 92,818 | 2,306,305 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 396,000 | — | 985,585 | 655,766 | 37,732 | 2,075,083 | |||||||||||||||||
Daniel D. Herink, Executive Vice President of Legal, General Counsel and Secretary | 2022 | 481,000 | — | 971,641 | 955,846 | 92,162 | 2,500,649 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 461,350 | — | 985,585 | 763,416 | 36,604 | 2,246,955 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 475,654 | 124,470 | 1,539,226 | 299,662 | 65,325 | 2,504,337 | |||||||||||||||||
1We pay our salaried employees, including our NEOs, on a biweekly basis. In 2020, there were 27 pay periods, which resulted in an additional payment to all salaried employees, including our NEOs.
2The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in the year indicated and includes time-vested restricted stock units, the 2020 LTIP Awards, the 2021 LTIP Awards, and the 2022 LTIP awards. The grant value of the 2020 LTIP Awards, the 2021 LTIP Awards, and the 2022 LTIP Awards are shown at target. Actual awards may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of phantom shares if the maximum performance level is achieved. The grant date fair value of the 2020 LTIP Awards assuming achievement of the maximum level of performance are: Mr. Sarvadi - $6,769,174; Mr. Sharp - $1,031,172; Mr. Arizpe - $1,665,848; Mr. Allison - $843,432; and Mr. Herink - $843,432. The grant date fair value of the 2021 LTIP Awards assuming achievement of the maximum level of performance are: Mr. Sarvadi - $7,393,002; Mr. Sharp - $1,218,390; Mr. Arizpe - $1,841,983; Mr. Allison - $926,284; and Mr. Herink - $926,284. The grant date fair value of the 2022 LTIP Awards assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance are: Mr. Sarvadi - $8,188,251; Mr. Sharp - $1,181,360; Mr. Arizpe - $1,784,792; Mr. Allison $898,062; and Mr. Herink $898,062. For additional information, refer to Note 9, “Incentive Plans,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for information on awards made in 2022. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the NEO.
3Represents variable cash compensation earned and awarded by the Compensation Committee under the Short-Term Incentive Program. A description of the Short-Term Incentive Program is included in “Variable Short-Term Incentive Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
4All other compensation in 2022 includes the following: Company-provided automobiles; 401(k) matching contributions; premiums for executive disability insurance; and occasional Company-related travel, events and use of Company-owned property. Certain of the aforementioned items involved no incremental cost to the Company. The cost of the Chairman’s Trip and spousal travel paid by the Company on behalf of the executive during 2022 for Messrs. Sharp, Allison, and Herink totaled $34,565 each and for Mr. Arizpe totaled $25,546. The associated federal income taxes totaled $15,494 each. The incremental cost of Mr. Arizpe’s use of a Company-leased vehicle was $25,529. The 401(k) matching contributions made by the Company during 2022 for the NEOs totaled $18,300 each.
| 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE
The following table provides information about equity and non-equity awards granted to theour NEOs in 2015:2022:
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards1 | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards2 | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)3 | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | 2/28/2022 | 419,394 | 1,677,577 | 3,355,154 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23,345 | 2,099,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | 21,678 | 43,355 | 86,710 | — | 4,094,126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | 2/28/2022 | 142,327 | 569,308 | 1,138,615 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,645 | 687,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | 3,128 | 6,255 | 12,510 | — | 590,680 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | 2/28/2022 | 214,183 | 856,731 | 1,713,462 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,450 | 850,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | 4,725 | 9,450 | 18,900 | — | 892,396 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James D. Allison | 2/28/2022 | 103,231 | 412,923 | 825,846 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,810 | 522,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | 2,378 | 4,755 | 9,510 | — | 449,031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Herink | 2/28/2022 | 119,481 | 477,923 | 955,846 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,810 | 522,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | — | — | — | 2,378 | 4,755 | 9,510 | — | 449,031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1These amounts represent the threshold, target and maximum amounts payable to each executive under the Short-Term Incentive Program for 2022. If the threshold is not achieved, the payout is zero. The amounts earned by our NEOs under the Short-Term Incentive Program in 2022 are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
2These amounts represent the threshold, target and maximum amount of shares payable to each executive under the LTIP.
3These amounts represent the number of RSUs granted to each executive under the 2012 Incentive Plan during 2022.
4These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs and phantom stock granted to each executive during 2022. For RSUs, fair value is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. The grant value of the 2022 LTIP Awards is shown at target. Actual 2022 LTIP Awards may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of phantom shares if below threshold level is not achieved or the maximum performance level is achieved. The grant date fair value of the 2022 LTIP Awards assuming achievement of the maximum level of performance are: Mr. Sarvadi - $8,188,251; Mr. Sharp - $1,181,360; Mr. Arizpe - $1,784,792; Mr. Allison $898,062; and Mr. Herink $898,062. For the relevant assumptions used to determine the valuation of our stock awards, refer to Note 9, “Incentive Plans,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023. The terms of the RSU awards provide for three-year vesting and the payment of dividend equivalents on all unvested shares. The 2022 LTIP Awards are payable in shares of our common stock and include dividend equivalents, payable in additional shares of our common stock, with respect to the number of phantom shares actually earned pursuant to the 2022 LTIP Awards if and to the extent dividends are paid on our common stock during the performance period.
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards1 | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards2 | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)3 | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)4 | |||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | N/A | 552,500 | 1,105,000 | 1,657,500 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| 2/19/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20,400 | 1,051,416 | ||||||||||
| 3/30/2015 | — | — | — | 15,175 | 30,350 | 60,700 | — | 1,602,480 | ||||||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | N/A | 173,400 | 346,800 | 468,180 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| 2/19/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,000 | 412,320 | ||||||||||
| 3/30/2015 | — | — | — | 2,650 | 5,300 | 10,600 | — | 279,840 | ||||||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | N/A | 247,000 | 494,000 | 691,600 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| 2/19/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,000 | 721,560 | ||||||||||
| 3/30/2015 | — | — | — | 5,675 | 11,350 | 22,700 | — | 599,280 | ||||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | N/A | 247,000 | 494,000 | 691,600 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| 2/19/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,000 | 721,560 | ||||||||||
| 3/30/2015 | 5,675 | 11,350 | 22,700 | — | 599,280 | |||||||||||||
| Jay E. Mincks | N/A | 236,000 | 472,000 | 660,800 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| 2/19/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14,000 | 721,560 | ||||||||||
| 3/30/2015 | — | — | — | 5,675 | 11,350 | 22,700 | — | 599,280 | ||||||||||
| 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS TABLE AT 20152022 FISCAL YEAR END
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)1 | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)2 | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | — | — | — | 47,852 | 3 | 5,435,987 | 171,882 | 19,525,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | — | — | — | 16,525 | 4 | 1,877,240 | 26,397 | 2,998,699 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | — | — | — | 20,710 | 5 | 2,352,656 | 40,914 | 4,647,830 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| James D. Allison | — | — | — | 12,749 | 6 | 1,448,286 | 20,635 | 2,344,136 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Herink | — | — | — | 12,749 | 6 | 1,448,286 | 20,635 | 2,344,136 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1Based on the closing price of $113.60 of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2022.
2Includes LTIP awards scheduled to vest (assuming target results for performance periods not yet complete and actual results for performance periods completed) and includes an estimate of dividend equivalents for the dividends declared since the date of grant. These awards will vest provided the officer continues to either be employed by us on the applicable vesting date or have satisfied the conditions under the Qualified Retirement Policy.
3Includes time-vested RSUs and dividend equivalents. Awards and dividend equivalents are scheduled to vest as follows provided the officer continues to be employed by us on the applicable vesting date: 24,677 on February 28, 2023; 15,238 on February 28, 2024 and 7,937 on February 28, 2025.
4Includes time-vested RSUs and dividend equivalents. Awards and dividend equivalents are scheduled to vest as follows provided the officer continues to be employed by us on the applicable vesting date: 8,594 on February 28, 2023; 5,331 on February 28, 2024 and 2,600 on February 28, 2025.
5Includes time-vested RSUs and dividend equivalents. Awards and dividend equivalents are scheduled to vest as follows provided the officer continues to be employed by us on the applicable vesting date: 10,906 on February 28, 2023; 6,591 on February 28, 2024 and 3,213 on February 28, 2025.
6Includes time-vested RSUs and dividend equivalents. Awards and dividend equivalents are scheduled to vest as follows provided the officer continues to be employed by us on the applicable vesting date: 6,721 on February 28, 2023; 4,052 on February 28, 2024 and 1,976 on February 28, 2025.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)1 | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)5 | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Unites or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)1 | ||||||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | — | — | — | 60,401 | 2 | 2,908,308 | 35,413 | 1,705,136 | |||||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | — | — | — | 22,001 | 3 | 1,059,348 | 6,185 | 297,808 | |||||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | — | — | — | 38,000 | 4 | 1,829,700 | 13,246 | 637,795 | |||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | — | — | — | 38,000 | 4 | 1,829,700 | 13,246 | 637,795 | |||||||||
| Jay E. Mincks | — | — | — | 38,000 | 4 | 1,829,700 | 13,246 | 637,795 | |||||||||
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 20152022
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | — | — | 21,034 | 1,876,301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | — | — | 7,475 | 666,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | — | — | 9,654 | 861,096 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| James D. Allison | — | — | 5,961 | 531,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Herink | — | — | 5,961 | 531,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1Represents the value of the shares on the vesting date based on the last reported closing price of our common stock on the NYSE immediately preceding the vesting date.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)1 | ||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | — | — | 38,400 | 1,942,225 | ||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | — | — | 13,333 | 674,283 | ||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | — | — | 23,500 | 1,188,960 | ||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | — | — | 23,500 | 1,188,960 | ||||||
| Jay E. Mincks | — | — | 23,500 | 1,188,960 | ||||||
| 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
SECURITIES RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS TABLE
The following table sets forth information about the Company’s Common Stockour common stock that was available for issuance under all of the Company’sour existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015:2022:
| Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plan Category | (# in thousands) | ($) | (# in thousands) | Plan Category | (# in thousands) | ($) | (# in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1 | 214 | 2 | 29.56 | 3 | 2,172 | 4 | Equity compensation plans approved by security holders1 | 426 | 2 | — | 3 | 3,203 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders | — | — | — | Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 214 | 29.56 | 2,172 | Total | 426 | — | 3,203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1The 2012 Incentive Plan and the Insperity, Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) have been approved by our stockholders. The ESPP is intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
2Includes 426,497 shares subject to issuance under the LTIP as of December 31, 2022 assuming maximum results for performance periods not yet complete and actual results for completed performance periods and associated dividend equivalents.
4This includes 2,260,221 shares available under the ESPP and 942,973 shares available under the 2012 Incentive Plan. As of April 4, 2023, 2,251,780 shares and 508,140 shares (assuming maximum results for performance periods not yet complete and actual results for performance periods completed) were available for issuance under the ESPP and the 2012 Incentive Plan, respectively. The securities remaining available for issuance under the 2012 Incentive Plan may be issued in the form of stock options, performance awards, stock awards (including restricted stock), phantom stock awards, stock appreciation rights, and other stock-based awards.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
Our current and former NEOs are eligible to receive potential payments and benefits in connection with an involuntary termination without cause, qualifying retirement, termination due to death or disability, or termination under certain circumstances following a change in control of the Company. The table and discussion below describes potential payments and other benefits that would have been received or receivable by each NEO under our executive severance plan or related plans and agreements, including our 2012 Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Program (including the applicable award agreements), if employment had been terminated under various circumstances on December 31, 2022. The timing of the payments described below to the NEOs may also be subject to the provisions of Section 409A which may delay payment. For equity awards, we calculated the value using the closing price on December 31, 2022, the last trading day of our fiscal 2022 year.
| Insperity | 38 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
| Retirement ($) | Termination Not For Cause ($) | Death or Disability ($) | Termination Not For Cause or For Good Reason After Change in Control ($) | |||||||||||
| Paul J. Sarvadi | ||||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) | — | 2,250,000 | — | 7,031,250 | ||||||||||
Time-vested RSUs(2) | 5,435,987 | — | 5,435,987 | 5,435,987 | ||||||||||
Short-Term Incentive Program(3) | 3,355,154 | 1,687,500 | — | — | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Program(4) | 14,583,841 | — | 13,005,953 | 19,525,595 | ||||||||||
Continued Health Care Benefits(5) | — | 36,495 | — | 45,619 | ||||||||||
| Total | 23,374,982 | 3,973,995 | 18,441,940 | 32,038,451 | ||||||||||
| Douglas S. Sharp | ||||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) | — | 859,500 | — | 2,292,000 | ||||||||||
Time-vested RSUs(2) | — | — | 1,877,240 | 1,877,240 | ||||||||||
Short-Term Incentive Program(3) | — | 573,000 | — | — | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Program(4) | — | — | 2,014,803 | 2,998,614 | ||||||||||
Continued Health Care Benefits(5) | — | 26,387 | — | 35,182 | ||||||||||
| Total | — | 1,458,887 | 3,892,043 | 7,203,036 | ||||||||||
| A. Steve Arizpe | ||||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) | — | 1,035,000 | — | 3,105,000 | ||||||||||
Time-vested RSUs(2) | 2,352,656 | — | 2,352,656 | 2,352,656 | ||||||||||
Short-Term Incentive Program(3) | 1,713,462 | 862,500 | — | — | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Program(4) | 3,522,167 | — | 3,160,929 | 4,647,627 | ||||||||||
Continued Health Care Benefits(5) | — | 24,526 | — | 32,701 | ||||||||||
| Total | 7,588,285 | 1,922,026 | 5,513,585 | 10,137,984 | ||||||||||
| James D. Allison | ||||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) | — | 624,000 | — | 1,664,000 | ||||||||||
Time-vested RSUs(2) | — | — | 1,448,286 | 1,448,286 | ||||||||||
Short-Term Incentive Program(3) | — | 416,000 | — | — | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Program(4) | — | — | 1,595,985 | 2,343,896 | ||||||||||
Continued Health Care Benefits(5) | — | 40,763 | — | 54,351 | ||||||||||
| Total | — | 1,080,763 | 3,044,271 | 5,510,533 | ||||||||||
| Daniel D. Herink | ||||||||||||||
Cash Severance(1) | — | 721,500 | — | 1,924,000 | ||||||||||
Time-vested RSUs(2) | — | — | 1,448,286 | 1,448,286 | ||||||||||
Short-Term Incentive Program(3) | — | 481,000 | — | — | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Program(4) | — | — | 1,595,985 | 2,343,896 | ||||||||||
Continued Health Care Benefits(5) | — | 40,763 | — | 54,351 | ||||||||||
| Total | — | 1,243,263 | 3,044,271 | 5,770,533 | ||||||||||
We have no employment agreements or severance policies in place for our NEOs or other executive officers. In the event an NEO voluntarily terminates employment (other than for good reason following a change in control of the Company) or employment is terminated for cause, there are no additional payments or benefits beyond any base salary accrued through the date of termination.
There are no unvested outstanding stock options and none have been granted to our executive officers since 2004.officers. All outstanding awards granted to named executive officersemployees, including to our NEOs, under the 2012 Incentive Plan include a “double trigger”
| Insperity | 39 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
requirement in the caseevent of a change in control of the Company as(as defined under theour 2012 Incentive Plan. Effective with awards granted in 2016, the Company amended the terms of award agreements to provide that future awards granted to any recipient under the 2012 Incentive Plan will includePlan). As a double trigger requirement in the case of a change in control of the Company as defined under the 2012 Incentive Plan. The directors first appointed to the Board pursuant to the 2015 Agreement are not considered members of the “Incumbent Board” for the purposes of determining whether a change in control has occurred with respect to outstanding awards granted prior to 2016 under the 2012 Incentive Plan. Under the terms of an amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan that was adopted by the Company in March 2016, however, each of those directors first appointed pursuant to the 2015 Agreement are considered members of the Incumbent Board for all awards granted after that amendment, which includes all awards granted in 2016. All other current directors are considered members of the Incumbent Board under the 2012 Incentive Plan and the new independent director to be appointed pursuant to the 2016 Agreement will also be considered a member of the Incumbent Board. The impositionresult of the double trigger means thatrequirement, awards subject to the double trigger requirement will no longer immediatelynot vest following a change in control unless there is a qualifying termination of employment after the change in control (see “–“Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis” for additional information). All outstanding awardsThere is no excise tax gross-up provision with respect to payments contingent upon a change in control under any of the Company’s plans, programs and we have no agreements with any of our executive officers.
(1)Cash Severance – NEOs and other executive officers are subjecteligible to participate in our Executive Severance Plan (“Severance Plan”) approved by the Board. Participation in the Severance Plan is conditioned upon execution of a double trigger requirementparticipation agreement which includes certain restrictive covenants in favor of the Company, a non-compete, a non-solicitation of customers and a non-solicitation of employees. Our NEOs have all awardsexecuted the participation agreement.
Under the Severance Plan, our current NEOs, if involuntarily terminated without “cause” (as defined in the Severance Plan) other than following a change in control (as defined in our 2012 Incentive Plan (“Change in Control”)), would receive cash severance in substantially equal installments during the severance period of 24 months for the CEO and 18 months for the other NEOs at their respective base salary in effect as of the date of termination. Our current NEOs, if involuntary terminated without cause or terminate for “good reason” (as defined in our Severance Plan) during the 18-month period after a Change in Control, would receive a lump sum cash severance equal to 30 months for the CEO and 24 months for the other NEOs of their respective base salary in effect as of the date of termination and their respective target annual bonus under the LTIPShort-Term Incentive Program.
Under terms of the Severance Plan, each NEO is required to enter into a general release of claims upon termination of employment, and payments remain conditioned upon the NEO’s continued adherence to non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disparagement covenants.
(2)Time-vested RSUs – At December 31, 2022, the NEOs have time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) outstanding under our 2012 Incentive Plan. The treatment of these equity awards will vary depending on the circumstances of the termination. Under the Company’s Qualified Retirement Policy, RSU awards will continue to vest in accordance with an awards vesting schedule provided the NEO’s last day of employment is at least 6 months after the grant date, the NEO has attained age 62 with 15 years of continuous service and the NEO provides the Company with 6 months advance notice of retirement and signs a general release of claims. RSUs are also subjectcredited with any dividend equivalents from the grant date.
In the event an NEO is involuntarily terminated, with or without cause, all unvested RSUs is forfeited. In the event of an NEO’s death, disability, or if during the 18-month period after a Change in Control a current NEO is involuntary terminated without cause or terminates for good reason (as defined in the applicable award agreement), all unvested RSUs are immediately vested and distributed, along with any dividend equivalents accrued on the RSUs, which are distributed in the form of additional shares.
(3)Short-Term Incentive Program – Our Short-Term Incentive Program provides for the annual bonus award to be forfeited if employment is terminated prior to the payment date, including in the event of death or disability. Under the Company’s Qualified Retirement Policy, Short-Term Incentive Program awards will be payable pro-rata based on the number of days the NEO was employed that year, at the actual level of achievement, and when awards are normally paid, provided the NEO has attained age 62 with 15 years of continuous service, provides the Company with 6 months advance notice of retirement and signs a double trigger requirement.general release of claims.
Under the Severance Plan, our current NEOs, if involuntarily terminated without cause, would receive a pro-rated lump sum payment when awards are normally paid but the amount will be based on the number of days the NEO was employed that year and assuming the target level of achievement. Our current NEOs, if involuntary terminated without cause or terminate for good reason (as defined in the Severance Plan) during the 18-month period after a Change in Control, are not entitled to any additional payment under the Short-Term Incentive Program, rather, the target annual bonus is included as part of the cash severance multiplier.
Upon termination due to disability or death, provided the holderNEO has been in continuous employmentcontinuously employed since the LTIP award date, outstanding awards will continue to vest based on actual achievement of the performance goal(s) during the performance period(s) pro-rated by a fraction, with the numerator of the total number of days of the NEO’s employment from the grant date through the date of the NEO’s disability or fordeath, and the denominator of the total number of days encompassing the first day of the first performance period and the last day of the last performance period applicable to the award (if multiple performance periods). Any LTIP amount determined on account of death or disability will be paid when the LTIP is regularly scheduled to be paid.
In the event an NEO is involuntarily terminated, with or without cause, other than in connection with a “change in control,” all unvested LTIP awards granted priorare forfeited.
| Insperity | 40 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
In the event the NEO has a “qualifying termination” (as defined in the LTIP) following a Change in Control, the NEO is eligible to March 2016, upon areceive the change in control for employees who are not NEOs. Unvested sharesvalue calculated based on the sum of restricted stock are forfeited upon termination(i) actual performance results for any reason other than disabilityperformance period that was completed on or death. The number of shares and market valueprior to the date of the restricted stock thatchange in control and (ii) for any incomplete performance period the greater of target performance or actual performance (if measurable), to be paid at the normal time, unless the successor entity fails to assume or replace the award which would automatically vest for eachresult in a shorter period to make payment. In the event the NEO upon terminationterminates due to death or disability or for a qualifying termination following a change in control, the change in control value shall be prorated.
LTIP awards are also credited with any dividend equivalents from the grant date.
(5)Continued Health Care Benefits – Under the Severance Plan, our NEOs, if involuntarily terminated without “cause” or, following a “change in control,” terminates for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the Severance Plan), would receive medical, dental and vision insurance under arrangements in which the NEO and/or the NEO’s dependents participated immediately prior to the date of termination, at no greater monthly premium cost to the NEO. These benefits shall continue for the same number of months that the cash severance benefit is determined for the NEO. The Company’s obligation to continue medical, dental and vision coverage terminates at the end of the severance period or, if earlier, when an NEO is employed by another party and is eligible for such coverage.
CEO PAY RATIO
Under Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are required to provide the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Sarvadi, the CEO, to the annual total compensation of our median employee.
As of December 31, 2022:
•The annual total compensation of our median corporate employee was $89,542; and
•The annual total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $10,700,380.
Based on this information, the ratio for 2022 of the annual total compensation for the CEO to the total annual compensation of our median employee was 120 to 1.
In order to determine this ratio, we first identified one of our employees as the median employee. We identified our median employee based on total annualized compensation paid during 2022 to all of our corporate employees, other than the CEO, who were employed by us on December 31, 2022. No cost of living adjustments were utilized in the compensation calculation. We did not include worksite employees in our calculations because our clients, who are unaffiliated third parties, determine the compensation of worksite employees.
After identifying the median employee, we calculated the annual total compensation of that employee using the same methodology used to calculate the compensation of our named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table.
The ratio presented above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules for identifying the median employee and determining the ratio. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to use different methodologies, exemptions, estimates and assumptions, the pay ratio presented above may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
The information provided below is mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, which require that we, among other things, report the amount of “compensation actually paid” to our NEOs for the fiscal years listed below. These amounts are calculated in accordance with applicable SEC rules, and do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned, realized or paid to our NEOs during each applicable year.
The guiding principles of our compensation philosophy are that pay should be linked to performance and that the interests of our executives and stockholders should be aligned. Please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section for details regarding how the Compensation Committee links the compensation paid to our NEOs to our corporate performance.
| Insperity | 41 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
| Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year (a) | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO1 ($) (b) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO2 ($) (c) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs3 ($) (d) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs4 ($) (e) | Total Shareholder Return (TSR)5 ($) (f) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (TSR)6 ($) (g) | Net Income7 ($) (h) | Company Selected Measure (CSM) Adjusted EBITDA8 ($) (i) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 10,700,380 | 15,936,961 | 3,035,129 | 3,804,625 | 142.65 | 113.87 | 179,350 | 352,295 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 9,624,154 | 13,826,504 | 2,754,388 | 3,770,647 | 145.44 | 152.43 | 124,080 | 254,946 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 9,561,338 | 13,276,744 | 3,380,686 | 4,449,825 | 96.84 | 100.85 | 138,237 | 288,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
1Mr. Sarvadi was our principal executive officer or “PEO” for each of the reported fiscal years. The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts reported for Mr. Sarvadi, for each corresponding year in the Total column of the Summary Compensation Table.
2The dollar amounts reported in column (c) represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Sarvadi, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect the total compensation actually earned, realized or received by Mr. Sarvadi. In accordance with these rules, the amounts reflected as Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for each year were adjusted as shown below:
| Year | Summary Compensation Total for PEO ($) | Less: Value of stock awards reported in Summary Compensation Table ($) | Plus: Year-end fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in the year ($) | Plus (Less): Year-over-year change in fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in prior yearsa ($) | Plus (Less): Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested in the year ($) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($) | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 10,700,380 | (6,194,009) | 9,308,384 | 2,730,231 | (608,025) | 15,936,961 | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 9,624,154 | (5,533,922) | 7,559,631 | 846,554 | 1,330,087 | 13,826,504 | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 9,561,338 | (7,731,542) | 13,279,113 | (381,417) | (1,450,748) | 13,276,744 | ||||||||||||||
a Includes value of any dividend equivalents credited in the applicable year that are otherwise not reflected in the fair value of such award.
3The names of each of the NEOs included for these purposes in each applicable year were as follows: (a) for 2022, Messrs. Allison, Arizpe, Herink, and Sharp; (b) for 2021, Messrs. Allison, Arizpe, Herink, and Sharp as well as Jay Mincks, our retired Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing; and (ci) for 2020, Messrs. Arizpe, Herink, Mincks, and Sharp. The dollar amounts reported in column (d) represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s non-PEO NEO’s as a group in the Total column of the Summary Compensation Table.
4The dollar amounts reported in column (e) represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to our non-PEO NEOs as a group, as computed in accordance with item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect the total compensation actually earned, realized or received by our non-PEO NEOs. In accordance with these rules, the amounts reflected as Total Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for each year were adjusted as shown below:
| Year | Average Summary Compensation Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | Less: Value of stock awards reported in Summary Compensation Table ($) | Plus: Year-end fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in the year ($) | Plus (Less): Year-over-year change in fair value of outstanding and unvested equity awards granted in prior yearsa ($) | Plus (Less): Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested in the year ($) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($) | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 3,035,129 | (1,241,014) | 1,783,406 | 437,164 | (210,060) | 3,804,625 | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2,754,388 | (1,307,778) | 1,766,807 | 344,487 | 212,743 | 3,770,647 | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 3,380,686 | (2,215,078) | 3,758,266 | (63,619) | (410,430) | 4,449,825 | ||||||||||||||
a Includes value of any dividend equivalents credited in the applicable year that are otherwise not reflected in the fair value of such award.
5Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end of each fiscal year shown and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. The beginning of the measurement period for each year in the table is the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2015,2019.
6The Peer Group TSR used for this purpose is set forththe S&P 1500 Composite Human Resource and Employment Services Index, which we also use in the Outstanding Equity Awards Table at 2015 Fiscal Year End, understock performance graph required by Item 201(a) of Regulation S-K included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the captions “Numberyear-ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023.
| Insperity | 42 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
7Net Income is a GAAP financial measure. Please read our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023.
8Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used by management to analyze the Company’s performance. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) plus tax reform bonuses, stock-based compensation and amortization of Shares or UnitsSaaS implementation costs. Please read Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Stock That Have Not Vested”Financial Condition and “Market ValueResults of Shares or UnitsOperations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023 for a reconciliation of Stock That Have Not Vested.”this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Performance
The charts that follow depict the relationship of "compensation actually paid" (CAP) to our PEOs and non-PEO NEOs to (1) the TSR of the Company and its peer group (as described in Footnote 6 above), (2) the Company's net income, and (3) the Company's annual non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA. The decrease in CAP for our non-PEO NEOs over the fiscal years presented is a reflection of the retirement of our long-time Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Mr. Mincks in 2021, the addition of a less tenured executive, Mr. Allison as an NEO in 2021 and the removal of Mr. Mincks as a reported NEO in 2022. Pursuant to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, CAP reflects adjustments to the fair value of equity awards during the years presented. Changes in our stock price and the projected and actual achievement of our performance goals greatly impact the total CAP reported for each year presented.
CAP Versus TSR
The following chart shows the amount of compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average amount of compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs as a group, together with the Company’s cumulative TSR, and the Peer Group TSR of the S&P 1500 Composite Human Resource and Employment Services Index, for the applicable years.
| Insperity | 43 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
CAP Versus Net Income
The following chart shows the amount of compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average amount of compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs as a group, together with the Company’s net income for the applicable years. Although the Company does not use net income as a performance measure in the overall executive compensation program, the Company believes net income is correlated with non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA and EBITDAIC, which represent the largest components of NEO compensation.
| Insperity | 44 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
CAP Versus Adjusted EBITDA
The following chart shows the amount of Contentscompensation actually paid to our PEO and the average amount of compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs as a group, together with the Company’s non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA for the applicable years. The Company selected non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA as our CSM as it represents the largest component of our LTIP and NEO compensation.
List of Most Important Performance Measures
The measures most important in determining NEO pay in 2022 were those used in our long-term and short-term incentive programs.
•Adjusted EBITDA (financial performance measure)
•Adjusted EBITDAIC (financial performance measure)
•Relative TSR (financial performance measure)
•Growth in Average Gross Profit per WSEE per Month (financial performance measure)
•Growth in Average WSEEs Paid (non-financial performance measure)
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
In 2022, directors were entitled to the following compensation:
| Board | Compensation Committee | Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | Lead Independent Director | |||||||
| Annual Retainers | $61,000 | $10,000 | $15,000 | None | $9,000 | 1 | |||||
| Annual Committee Chair Fees | N/A | $12,000 | $21,000 | $10,000 | 1 | None | |||||
| 2023 Proxy Statement | |||||||
| Board | Compensation Committee | Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | Lead Independent Director | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual Retainers | $80,000 | $10,000 | $15,000 | $5,000 | $35,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual Committee Chair Fees | N/A | $15,000 | $25,000 | $15,000 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On the date of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director receives an annual director award of unrestricted shares of our common stock. For 2022, the aggregate fair market value of this award was $175,000, which was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the date prior to the date of grant. The awards are rounded up to the next higher whole share amount in the case of a fractional share amount. Each person who is initially appointed or elected as a director of the Company receives an initial director award comprised of a grant of shares of restricted Common Stock on the date of election or appointment with an aggregate fair market value, determined based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the date prior to the date of grant, of $75,000, rounded up to the next higher whole share amount in the case of a fractional share amount, and such restricted Common Stock vests as to one-third of the shares on each anniversary of its grant date. If a director terminates his or her service as a member of the Board, his or her unvestedpro-rated portion of such restricted stock award, if any, shall terminate immediately on such termination date, unless such termination of service is due to death or disability, in which event the unvested portion of such restricted stock award shall become 100% vested on such termination date. Pursuant to the 2015 Agreement, each of Mr. Feld, Ms. McKenna-Doyle and Mr. Sorensen received an initial director award effective as of the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Pursuant to the 2016 Agreement, Mr. Morphy is entitled to receive the initial director award effective as of the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION TABLE
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Companyus to our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2022.
| Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards | Option Awards | All Other Compensation | Total | |||
| Name | ($) | ($)2 | ($) | ($)3 | ($) | ||
| Michael W. Brown | 66,500 | 89,578 | — | 1,146 | 157,223 | ||
| Peter Feld | 37,640 | 74,665 | — | 955 | 4 | 113,260 | |
Jack M. Fields, Jr.1 | 44,849 | — | — | — | 44,849 | ||
| Eli Jones | 78,500 | 89,578 | — | 1,146 | 169,223 | ||
| Carol Kaufman | 85,750 | 89,578 | — | 2,103 | 4 | 177,430 | |
Paul S. Lattanzio1 | 47,574 | — | — | — | 47,574 | ||
| Michelle McKenna-Doyle | 32,013 | 74,665 | — | 955 | 4 | 107,634 | |
| Norman Sorensen | 40,290 | 74,665 | — | 955 | 4 | 115,910 | |
| Austin P. Young | 90,250 | 89,578 | — | 1,146 | 180,973 | ||
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)1 | Option Awards ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
| Timothy T. Clifford | 142,500 | 174,242 | — | — | 316,742 | |||||||||||||||
| Eli Jones | 87,500 | 174,242 | — | — | 261,742 | |||||||||||||||
| Carol R. Kaufman | 106,250 | 174,242 | — | — | 280,492 | |||||||||||||||
| John L. Lumelleau | 92,250 | 174,242 | — | — | 266,492 | |||||||||||||||
| Ellen H. Masterson | 117,500 | 174,242 | — | — | 291,742 | |||||||||||||||
| Randall Mehl | 87,500 | 174,242 | — | — | 261,742 | |||||||||||||||
| John M. Morphy | 92,500 | 174,242 | — | — | 266,742 | |||||||||||||||
| Latha Ramchand | 92,500 | 174,242 | — | — | 266,742 | |||||||||||||||
| Richard G. Rawson | 77,500 | 174,242 | — | — | 251,742 | |||||||||||||||
_________________________
REPORT OF THE FINANCE, RISK MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee (“FRMA Committee”) has been appointed by the Board to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the financial affairs, risk management, accounting and financial reporting processes, and audits of the financial statements of the Company. We operate under a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by us. We have furnished the following report for 2015.2022.
We have reviewed and discussed the Company’s consolidated audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, with management and the independent auditor.auditor, which was Ernst & Young LLP. We discussed with the independent auditorErnst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by the standards adopted or referenced byapplicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and SEC, Communications with Audit Committees, as currently in effect.
| Insperity | 46 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
The FRMA Committee received from Ernst & Young LLP a formal written letter describing all relationships between the independent auditorfirm and the written disclosures and letter required byCompany, including persons in financial oversight roles at the PCAOB regardingCompany, that may reasonably be thought to bear on the independent auditor’s communicationsauditors’ independence consistent with us concerning independence, as currently in effect, and weIndependent Standards Board Standard No. 1. The FRMA Committee also discussed with the independent auditor its independence. We also considered the compatibility of theErnst & Young LLP any relationships that might impact their objectivity and independence, and approved in advance all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided. The FRMA Committee concluded that Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of other permitted non-audit services to the Company is compatible with the independent auditor’sErnst & Young LLP’s independence.
Based on our reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended that the Board include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, for filing with the SEC.
| THE FINANCE, RISK MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT COMMITTEE | |||||
| Ellen H. Masterson, Chairperson | |||||
| John L. Lumelleau | |||||
| John M. Morphy | |||||
| Latha Ramchand | |||||
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’sour directors and officers and persons who own more than 10% of the Common Stockour common stock to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership (Forms 3, 4, and 5) of Common Stockour common stock with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms that they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) reports with respect to the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were timely filed.filed, other than one late Form 4 filing for each of the Company’s officers due to an administrative error following the certification of 2021 performance achievement for awards granted under the Company’s 2012 Incentive Plan.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee has adopted a statement of policy and procedures with respect to related party transactions covering the review, approval or ratification of transactions involving the Company and “Related Parties” (generally, directors and executive officers and their immediate family members and 5% stockholders). The policy currently covers transactions in which the Company and any Related Party are participants and, in which thewith respect to Related Party hasParties who are executive officers, also have a material interest, other than transactions involving an amount equal to or less than $50,000 (individually or when aggregated with all similar transactions) and not involving non-employee directors.interest. The policy generally requires that such transactions be approved by the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee in advanceconduct a reasonable prior review and oversight of the consummation orall such transactions, including any material amendment of theto any such prior transaction. Under the policy, prior to entering into a related party transaction, full disclosure of all of the surrounding facts and circumstances relating to the transaction must be made to the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee, which will approve such transaction only if it is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and itsour stockholders. In the event a transaction is not identified as a related party transaction in advance, it will be submitted promptly to the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee or the chairperson thereof, and such committee or chairperson, as the case may be, will evaluate the transaction and evaluate all options, including but not limited to ratification, amendment or termination of the transaction.
In addition and as part of the Company’s processes to monitor related party transactions, each director and named executive officer annually completes a questionnaire that requests disclosure of information not previously provided concerning transactions with the Company in which the director or executive officer, or any member of his or her immediate family, has a direct or indirect material interest.
A significant component of our marketing strategy is the title sponsorship of the Insperity InvitationalTM golf tournament, a Champions PGA tour event held annually in The Woodlands, Texas, a suburb of Houston. Consistent with other PGA golf tournaments, the Insperity Invitational golf tournament benefits and is managed by a non-profit organization, Greater Houston Golf Charities (“GHGC”). In connection with the Company’sour sponsorship, Mr. Jay E. Mincks, our former Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing, serves as chairman of GHGC, a non-compensatory position. During 2015,2022, the Company paid GHGC $3.5$3.7 million in sponsorship and tournament related expenses, as well as an additional $0.9$1.4 million
| Insperity | 47 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
in other event sponsorships and charitable contributions.
contributions, including to certain non-profit organizations on which Messrs. Sarvadi or Rawson serve as a member of the board of directors.
We provide PEO-related services to certain entities that are owned by, or have board members that are, Related Parties.related parties. These Related Partiesrelated parties include Ms. Ellen H. Masterson, Mr. Richard G. Rawson and Mr. Paul J. Sarvadi and Mr. Jack M. Fields, Jr. or members of their families. The PEO service fees paid by such entities are within the pricing range of other unrelated clients of ours. During 2015,2022, such client companies paid the Company the following service fees, which are presented net of the associated payroll costs:
| Related Party | Net Service Fees | / | (Payroll Costs) | ||||||||
| Ms. Masterson (one client company) | $ | 348,645 | $ | (1,674,676) | |||||||
| Mr. Clifford (one client company) | $ | 77,876 | $ | (601,215) | |||||||
| Mr. Rawson (four client companies) | $ | 1,032,407 | $ | (4,881,627) | |||||||
| Mr. Sarvadi (three client companies) | $ | 642,115 | $ | (1,270,188) | |||||||
| Related Party | Net Service Fees / (Payroll Costs) | |||||||
| Mr. Rawson (three client companies) | $ | 491,238 | $ | (1,636,797 | ) | |||
| Mr. Sarvadi (four client companies) | $ | 334,367 | $ | (572,818 | ) | |||
Mr. Fields1 (two client companies) | $ | 183,907 | $ | (650,932 | ) | |||
In the ordinary course of business, we occasionally charter private aircraft from a third-party air charter company, which also leases and $370,050 (five corporate employees), respectively.
operates aircraft owned by Mr. Sarvadi. Pursuant to a corporate policy, when we charter the 2015 Agreement,aircraft owned by Mr. Sarvadi, we pay an hourly rate plus certain trip expenses, which we believe is below the Company reimbursed Starboard’s legal feesmarket rate for similar aircraft. The hourly rate generally includes amounts related to cost to operate the aircraft per hour, such as fuel, pilot compensation, and maintenance. Mr. Sarvadi is generally responsible for paying the actual costs himself. During 2022, we paid a total of $276,765 and, pursuant$828,254 to the 2016 Agreement,charter company, which is comprised of the Company has agreedhourly rate plus expenses, in connection with our usage of Mr. Sarvadi’s aircraft. Mr. Sarvadi’s interest is equal to reimburse Starboard for up to $100,00085% of its legal fees.the hourly rate paid, or $533,397.
PROPOSAL NUMBER 2:
THE INSPERITY, INC. INCENTIVE PLAN
•Increase the number of shares of common stock (“shares”) reserved for issuance under the 2017 Plan by 1,325,000 shares;
•Prohibit (i) any shares not issued or delivered from the net settlement of outstanding stock options (“Options”) or share appreciation rights (“SARs”), (ii) shares withheld in respect of taxes or to pay the exercise price of Options or SARs, and (iii) shares repurchased on the open market with proceeds of the exercise price of Options or SARs from being reissued or available for future grants under the Plan;
•Include a change in control definition and a section that specifically discloses the change in control vesting treatment for both time- and performance-based awards and clarifies that assumed awards under the Plan (“Awards”) will not immediately vest upon a change in control of the Company;
•Require that Awards (other than cash Awards) to employees under the Plan be granted with a minimum vesting period of one (1) year, subject to earlier vesting for termination of employment due to death, disability, retirement or a change in control, and a maximum exception of five percent (5%) of authorized shares for issuance;
•Include clarifying language expressly stating that any dividend or dividend equivalent rights granted with an Award will be subject to the same time and performance vesting conditions as the underlying Award;
| Insperity | 48 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
•Include clarifying language expressly prohibiting reload Option grants;
•Include clarifying language expressly stating that all Awards are subject to potential cancellation, rescission, clawback and recoupment in accordance with the Company’s clawback/recoupment policy and/or to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 951954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and any regulations or listing requirements promulgated thereunder;
•Increase the number of shares corresponding to employee and director Award limits set forth in the 2017 Plan;
•Permit the Compensation Committee of the Board or any other committee designated by the Board (the “Committee”) to grant employee awards covering up to a maximum of 5% of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan that are not subject to a one-year minimum vesting period; and
•Omit certain language in the 2017 Plan relating to the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as this exception was eliminated by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Determination of Share Reserve
Currently, the 2017 Plan has 508,140 shares available for future Awards. If any awards are granted between April 4, 2023 and the date stockholders approve this Proposal, the shares subject to such awards would be deducted from the 508,140 shares remaining under the 2017 Plan, such that the new number of shares available for new awards going forward would also be reduced, and would equal the sum of 508,140, less the shares subject to awards granted after April 4, 2023, plus the 1,325,000 new shares. This number of shares remaining available as of April 4, 2023, is insufficient to carry out the purposes of the Plan, discussed below. If Proposal 2 is adopted, the shares reserved for the Plan will be increased by another 1,325,000 shares.
The Plan’s purposes remain unchanged and are to: (a) retain and attract persons of training, experience and ability to serve as employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and to serve as non-employee directors of the Company; (b) encourage a sense of proprietorship of such persons; and, (c) stimulate the active interest of such persons in the development and financial success of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company’s stockholders most recently approved the 2017 Plan at the annual meeting of stockholders held on June 16, 2017. The Board believes that the 2017 Plan is achieving its objectives and believes that to continue to carry out its objectives, it is necessary to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan.
The Board and Committee considered a number of factors in determining the share reserve for the Plan, including the number of shares remaining available under the 2017 Plan, our past share usage, our estimate of the number of shares needed for future awards and potential dilution.
| As of April 4, 2023 | |||||
| Total equity awards outstanding (A) | 1,518,868 | ||||
| Shares available for grant under the 2017 Plan prior to increase (B) | 508,140 | ||||
| Shares of common stock (C) | 38,203,488 | ||||
Dilution1 | 5 | % | |||
1Dilution is calculated as (A) + (B) / (A) + (B) +(C)
If the Plan is approved, the proposed increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance would increase dilution to approximately 8%.
Our three-year average burn rate was 2% for fiscal year 2020 through fiscal year 2022 and our one-year burn rate for fiscal 2022 was 2%. We define burn rate as the total number of full value shares granted to participants over one fiscal year expressed as a percent of the fully diluted weighted average common shares outstanding. We average our burn rate over three fiscal years to determine our three-year average burn rate. We believe our historical burn rates are reasonable for a company of our size in our industry.
| Insperity | 49 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Summary of Sound Governance Features
Our Board and Compensation Committee believe the 2017 Plan and the Plan contains several features that are consistent with the interests of stockholders and sound corporate governance practices, including the following:
| a | No “Evergreen” Provision. Under both the 2017 Plan and the Plan, the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance is fixed and will not adjust based upon the number of shares outstanding. | ||||
| a | Prohibition of Discounted Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The 2017 Plan and the Plan prohibits granting options and stock appreciation rights with exercise prices lower than the fair market value of a share on the grant date. | ||||
| a | No Repricing or Exchange of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights Without Stockholder Approval. Under both the 2017 Plan and the Plan, options and stock appreciation rights issued will not be repriced, replaced or regranted through cancellation, by decreasing the exercise price of a previously granted award or by exchanging the previously granted award for a cash buyout or settlement. | ||||
| a | Minimum Vesting for Employee Equity Awards. Under both the 2017 Plan and the Plan, employee equity awards are generally subject to a minimum one-year vesting requirement, subject to limited exceptions. | ||||
| a | Prohibition of Reload Options. The Plan provides that options will not be granted under the Plan in consideration for and will not be conditioned upon the delivery of shares to the Company in payment of the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligation under any other option held by a participant. | ||||
| a | No Automatic Single-Trigger Vesting Upon a Change in Control. The Plan generally provides for accelerated vesting of awards only in the event the continuing entity after a change in control fails to assume or replace an award with a new award of equivalent value and substantially equivalent terms or upon a termination without cause or for good reason within a time period following a change in control. | ||||
| a | No Recycling of Appreciation Awards. The Plan provides that the following shares will not again be made available for award under the Plan: (a) shares not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding option or stock appreciation right; (b) shares withheld by the Company from shares that would otherwise have been delivered upon exercise of an option or stock appreciation right, or shares tendered to the Company, in each case, in satisfaction of the grant or exercise price or tax withholding requirements of an option or stock appreciation right; or (c) shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the option exercise price. | ||||
| a | No Payment of Dividends on Unvested Awards. The Plan prohibits the extension of dividends to options and stock appreciation awards, and for all other awards prohibits the payment of dividends on unvested awards. | ||||
| a | Clawback/Recoupment Policy. The Plan provides that all awards are subject to potential cancellation, rescission, clawback and recoupment in accordance with the Company’s clawback/recoupment policy, and/or to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and any regulations or listing requirements promulgated thereunder. | ||||
Required Affirmative Vote
If the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting in favor of Proposal 2 exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal, the Plan will be approved. If Proposal 2 is not approved by the stockholders, the 2017 Plan will continue in its present form.
| The Board recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the Plan, an amendment and restatement of the 2017 Plan, and proxies executed and returned will be so voted unless contrary instructions are indicated thereon. | ||
Summary of the Plan
The following description of the Plan is only a summary of certain provisions thereof and is qualified in its entirety be reference to the full text of the Plan, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement, which should be read in conjunction with the following summary.
| Insperity | 50 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Current Awards Outstanding
In February 2023, the Company certified performance results on the outstanding awards under the 2017 Plan and made its annual grant of awards to employees under the 2017 Plan. A summary of the shares outstanding under the 2017 Plan that includes these events is provided below as of April 4, 2023:
| Stock options outstanding | — | ||||
| Weighted average exercise price | n/a | ||||
| Weighted average term (in years) | n/a | ||||
| Restricted stock outstanding | 100 | ||||
| Restricted stock units outstanding | 1,043,216 | ||||
| LTIP awards outstanding | 475,552 | ||||
| Shares remaining for grant under the 2017 Plan | 508,140 | ||||
| Common stock outstanding | 38,203,488 | ||||
Eligibility for Participation
All employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and non-employee directors of the Company are eligible for Awards under the Plan.
Administration
The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors or any other committee that may be designated by the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The Committee or Board will select the employees who will receive Awards, determine the type and terms of Awards to be granted, and interpret and administer the Plan. The Board has the power to determine the type and terms of Awards to be granted to non-employee directors. Neither the Board nor the Committee may delegate to any person the authority to grant Awards to, or take other action with respect to, participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Awards under the Plan may be granted in tandem with other compensation. The Committee may extend the exercisability and waive restrictions in any manner not adverse to the participant. However, without prior stockholder approval, Options and SARs granted under the Plan may not be re-priced or exchanged for a cash buyout or settlement with a lower exercise price. In certain limited circumstances for capitalization changes (for example, a stock split), the number of Awards may be equitably adjusted
Shares Reserved
The 2017 Plan has reserved an aggregate number of 5,523,610 shares (as adjusted for the two-for-one stock split that took effect on December 18, 2017). As of April 4, 2023, 508,140 shares are available for future awards. Please see footnote 4 to the “Securities Reserved for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans Table” for additional information. If approved by stockholders, the 2017 Plan is being amended and restated as the Plan to increase this number of shares to 6,848,610. If approved by stockholders, future grants of Awards under the Plan will prohibit any shares not issued or delivered from the net settlement of outstanding Options or SARs, shares withheld in respect of taxes or to pay the exercise price of Options or SARs, and shares repurchased on the open market with proceeds of the exercise price of Options or SARs from being reissued or available for future grants under the Plan. No Awards relating to any of the additional 1,325,000 shares will be granted under the 2017 Plan if the Plan is not approved by stockholders. The proposed share limit is subject to adjustment for certain transactions affecting the common stock. Lapsed, forfeited or canceled Awards, as well as shares withheld to pay taxes for Awards other than Options and SARs, will not count against this limit and can be re-granted under the Plan.
Terms, Conditions and Limitations of Employee Awards
Performance Objectives. The Committee may condition any employee performance award under the Plan on the achievement of one or more performance objectives. The term “performance objectives” means the objectives established by the Committee that are to be achieved with respect to an Award, which may be described in terms of Company-wide objectives, in terms of objectives that are related to performance of a division, subsidiary, department, adjacent business unit, geographic market or function within the Company or a subsidiary in which the person receiving the Award is employed, or in individual or other terms, and which will relate to a period of time determined by the Committee. The
| Insperity | 51 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Committee shall determine the performance objectives to be achieved and the length of time allowed to achieve any performance objectives.
The performance objectives may include, but not be limited to, one or more of the following: (a) cash flows; (b) client margin; (c) client retention; (d) customer margin; (e) earnings before interest and taxes; (f) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses; (g) earnings before taxes and unusual or nonrecurring items; (h) earnings per share; (i) earnings per share growth; (j) economic value added; (k) fee revenue; (l) gross mark-up per worksite employee; (m) gross profit; (n) net earnings; (o) number of paid worksite employees; (p) operating expenses; (q) operating income; (r) operating margin; (s) profit margin; (t) return on assets; (u) return on capital employed in the business; (v) return on equity; (w) return on investment; (x) return on sales; (y) return on total capital; (z) revenue; (aa) service efficiency; (bb) stock price performance; (cc) total profit; (dd) total revenue; (ee) total revenue less bonus payroll; (ff) total stockholder return; and (gg) unit growth.
Employee Stock Options
Options granted to employees are subject to such terms and conditions as may be established by the Committee, except that the option exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value per share of the common stock on the date of grant. Options may be granted either as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, nonqualified stock options or a combination thereof. No ISO may be exercised more than 10 years after the date of grant. Payment of the option exercise price may be by cash or, if permitted by the Committee, by means of tendering shares or surrendering all or part of the applicable option or any other award.
Performance Awards
The Committee may grant a performance award consisting of any type of Award or combination of Awards. A performance award is subject to the achievement of one or more performance objectives.
Performance Units
The Committee may grant an Award in performance units. Performance units are units equivalent to $100 (or such other value as the Committee determines) and may consist of payments in cash, shares or a combination thereof, payable upon the achievement of specified performance goals.
Stock Award (including Restricted Stock and RSUs)
The Committee may grant an Award denominated in or payable in shares, which may be restricted stock or an RSUs (each as described below).
Phantom Stock Awards
The Committee may grant an Award in phantom shares, which represent the right to receive the value of a specified number of shares and may be payable in cash, shares or a combination thereof.
Restricted Stock
The Committee may grant an Award in restricted stock. Restricted stock are shares that are restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions.
Restricted Stock Units
The Committee may grant an Award in restricted stock units (“RSUs”). An RSU is the right to receive the value of one share (or a percentage of such value) in cash, shares or combination thereof.
Stock Appreciation Rights
The Committee may grant an Award in SARs. SARs represent the right to receive an amount shares or cash equal to the appreciation in value of a specified number of shares over a particular period of time. SARs are subject to such terms and conditions as may be established by the Committee, except that the SAR exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value per share on the date of grant.
| Insperity | 52 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Cash Awards
The Committee may grant an Award in cash.
Other Stock-Based Awards
The Committee, in its discretion, may grant other forms of Awards based on, or payable in, shares.
Annual Award Limits
During any one calendar year, Awards with respect to common stock to any individual employee participant are limited to 750,000 shares from each of the following categories: (a) Options or SARs; (b) stock awards (excluding restricted stock, but including RSUs), phantom stock awards or other stock-based awards; and (c) restricted stock. During any one calendar year, no participant may receive an aggregate payment under cash awards or performance awards payable in cash in excess of $15,000,000.
Terms, Conditions and Limitations of Non-employee Director Awards
The Board may grant Awards to non-employee directors, which may consist of the forms of Awards available to employees (excluding ISOs), and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan.
The Plan provides that no non-employee director may be granted during any one calendar year director awards having a value determined on the grant date that, when added to all cash compensation paid to the director during the same calendar year, excluding any amounts deferred from a prior calendar year, would exceed $1,000,000.
Other Terms and Limitations
Minimum Vesting for Employee Awards
All employee Awards, other than cash awards, are subject to a minimum vesting period of one year from the grant date, with limited exceptions for death, disability, retirement or a change in control. The Committee may grant a maximum of five percent (5%) of authorized shares that are not subject to the one year minimum vesting requirement.
Transferability
Awards under the Plan generally will not be transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order; provided, however, the Committee may, in its discretion, permit a participant to transfer all or a portion of any Award that is not an ISO to the participant’s “immediate family members” (as defined in the Plan), or a trust for the exclusive benefit of immediate family members or a partnership in which immediate family members and the participant are the only partners.
Deferral
The Committee, in its discretion, may permit participants to elect to defer payment of some or all types of Awards or provide for the deferral of an Award. Deferrals will only be permitted in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Dividends and Interest
An Award, excluding Options and SARs, denominated in common stock or units of common stock may include dividends or dividend equivalent rights. The Committee may also establish rules for the crediting of interest on deferred cash payments and dividend equivalents for deferred payments denominated in common stock or units of common stock. Any dividend or dividend equivalent rights will be subject to the same time and performance vesting conditions as the underlying Award and will be paid only if the underlying Award vests.
No Reload Grants
Options will not be granted under the Plan in consideration for and will not be conditioned upon the delivery of shares to the Company in payment of the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligation under any other Option held by a participant.
| Insperity | 53 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Adjustments to Awards Following Grant
The Committee may provide for adjustment of Awards following grant under the Plan in limited circumstances. In the event of any common stock distribution or split, recapitalization, extraordinary distribution, merger, consolidation, combination or exchange of shares of or similar change or upon the occurrence of any other event that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, the Committee may adjust the number, price, award limitations and/or shares covered by an Award to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended under the Plan.
In the event of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation, the Committee shall be authorized to: (i) issue or assume Awards and (ii) cancel and terminate unexercised or outstanding Awards in exchange for cash in an amount determined to be the fair market value of such Awards. The Committee may amend any stock-based Award to reflect a change in accounting rules, and may amend any Award for a significant event to reflect the original intent of the Award.
Award Exercise
A participant must pay the exercise price of an Award in cash at the time of exercise, unless the Committee permits the exercise price to be paid in the form of shares or by surrendering all or part of that Award or another Award.
Tax Withholding
The Plan permits the Committee to allow a participant, upon exercise, payment or vesting of an Award, to satisfy any applicable tax withholding requirements in the form of shares, including shares issuable upon exercise, payment or vesting of such Award.
Change in Control
Upon a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the Plan), unvested Awards will not automatically vest. Instead, outstanding Awards will continue in effect unless: (i) the continuing entity fails to agree to assume, replace or substitute an Award with another award of equivalent or greater value and on substantially similar or more favorable terms, or (ii) to the extent specifically set forth in the award agreement, the participant experiences a Qualifying Termination (as defined under the Plan). In determining the performance of unvested performance awards, Awards will vest based on actual performance for any performance periods completed on or before the change in control date, or based upon the greater of the target level or actual performance level achieved (if measurable), for performance periods remaining open, or scheduled to begin, after the change in control date.
Clawback or Recoupment of Awards
All Awards are subject to potential cancellation, rescission, clawback and recoupment in accordance with the Company’s clawback/recoupment policy, and/or to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and any regulations or listing requirements promulgated thereunder.
Amendment and Termination
The Board may amend, alter or discontinue the Plan, except that no amendment or alteration that would impair the rights of a holder of any Award shall be made without the holder’s consent, and no amendment or alteration shall be effective prior to approval by the stockholders to the extent the Board determines such approval is required by applicable laws, regulations or exchange requirements.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary of current U.S. federal income tax treatment of non-cash Awards, which are authorized to be granted under the Plan, based upon current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and regulations promulgated thereunder. The statutory rules and interpretations are subject to change, and may vary in individual circumstances.
Stock Options
The Internal Revenue Code provides that a participant receiving a nonqualified stock option ordinarily does not realize taxable income upon the grant of the Option. A participant does, however, realize compensation income taxed at ordinary
| Insperity | 54 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
income tax rates upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option to the extent that the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise exceeds the Option price. When the participant sells the shares acquired pursuant to a nonqualified stock option, any gain or loss will be short-term or long-term capital gain or loss.
The grant of an ISO does not result in taxable income to a participant. The exercise of an ISO also does not result in taxable income, provided that the circumstances satisfy the requirements in the Internal Revenue Code. However, the exercise of an ISO may give rise to alternative minimum tax liability for the participant. In addition, if the participant does not dispose of the common stock acquired upon exercise of an ISO during the statutory holding period, then any gain or loss upon subsequent sale of the common stock will be a long-term capital gain or loss. The statutory holding period lasts until the later of two years from the date the option is granted or one year from the date the common stock is transferred to the participant pursuant to the exercise of the option.
If the statutory holding period requirements for an ISO are satisfied, the Company may not claim any federal income tax deduction upon either the exercise of the ISO or the subsequent sale of the common stock received upon exercise. If these requirements are not satisfied (a “disqualifying disposition”), the amount of ordinary income taxable to the participant is the lesser of: (a) the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise minus the option price; or, (b) the amount realized on disposition minus the option price. Any gain in excess of that amount is capital gain, while any loss recognized will be a capital loss.
For nonqualified stock options, the Company is generally entitled to a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by the participant.
Restricted Stock
A participant acquiring restricted stock will generally recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date, less any amount paid, if any, by the participant. Under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, a participant may elect to include in ordinary income at the time restricted stock is first issued, the excess of the fair market value of the stock at the time of issuance over the amount paid, if any, by the participant. In this event, any subsequent change in the value of the shares will be recognized for tax purposes as capital gain or loss upon disposition of the shares. A participant makes a Section 83(b) election by filing the election with the IRS no later than 30 days after the restricted stock is transferred to the participant. With a Section 83(b) election, the participant will not be entitled to any loss deduction if the shares with respect to which a Section 83(b) election was made are later forfeited. Absent a Section 83(b) election, any cash dividends or other distributions paid with respect to the restricted stock prior to the lapse of the restrictions or risk of forfeiture will be included in the participant’s ordinary income as compensation at the time of receipt and subsequent appreciation or depreciation will be recognized as capital gain or loss. The Company will generally be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes at the same time and in the same amount that a participant recognizes ordinary income from restricted stock under the Plan.
Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Units, Phantom Stock and Other Stock-Based Awards
Generally, a participant will not recognize any taxable income upon the grant of SARs, RSUs, phantom stock or other stock-based awards. At the time the participant receives the payment for the SAR, RSU, phantom stock or other stock-based awards, the fair market value of shares or the amount of any cash received in payment for such Awards generally is taxable compensation to the participant taxed as ordinary income. The Company or one of its subsidiaries will generally be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes at the same time and in the same amount that a participant recognizes ordinary income from SARs, RSUs, phantom stock or other stock-based awards under the Plan.
Performance Awards
A participant will generally not recognize any taxable income upon the grant of performance awards or performance units. Upon settlement of such Awards, participants normally will recognize ordinary income in the year of receipt equal to the amount of cash and the fair market value of any common stock received. The Company or one of its subsidiaries will generally be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes at the same time and in the same amount that a participant recognizes ordinary income from performance awards or performance units under the Plan.
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A
Some Awards under the Plan, such as RSUs, performance units,phantom stock and other stock-based awards may be considered to be deferred compensation subject to special federal income tax rules under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Failure to satisfy the applicable requirements under Section 409A may
| Insperity | 55 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
result in the acceleration of income and additional income tax liability to the participant, including certain penalties. Awards granted under the Plan are intended to be either exempt from, or comply with, the requirements under Section 409A. Distributions to certain participants identified as “specified employees” shall be delayed to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A.
Certain Tax Code Limitations on Deductibility
All of the above-described deductions are subject to the limitations on deductibility described in Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). If the payment of Awards in connection with a change in control, are not sufficiently reduced under terms of the Plan, an excess parachute payment under the Internal Revenue Code could result, triggering a 20% excise tax (in addition to income tax otherwise owed) payable by the participant. The Company will not be entitled to a deduction for that portion of any “parachute payment” that is subject to the excise tax. Therefore, there can be no assurance that compensation attributable to Awards under the Plan will be fully deductible to the Company under all circumstances.
THE ABOVE SUMMARY OF THE EXPECTED EFFECT OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX UPON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PLAN IS NOT COMPLETE, AND THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS THAT THE PARTICIPANTS CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS FOR COUNSELING. MOREOVER, THE ABOVE SUMMARY IS BASED UPON CURRENT FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THE TAX TREATMENT UNDER FOREIGN, STATE OR LOCAL LAW IS NOT COVERED IN THE ABOVE SUMMARY.
As of the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting, no Awards will have been granted under the Plan. Subject to stockholder approval of the Plan, the allocation of Awards in 2023 under the Plan is not currently determinable because Awards will be made in accordance with future decisions of the Committee following the general guidelines of the Plan. A description of the Awards granted during 2022 to named executive officers under the 2017 Plan can be found under “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2022 Executive Compensation Program” and under the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.”
History of Option Grants Under the 2017 Plan
No Option awards have been made to directors, executive officers or other employees under the 2017 Plan.
| The Board unanimously recommends a “FOR” vote for Proposal 2. | ||||||||||||||
PROPOSAL NUMBER 3:
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with an opportunity to make a non-binding recommendation on the compensation of our NEOs. At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders recommended that we hold an annual advisory vote on executive compensation and in light of this result, the Board plans to hold a non-binding vote on NEO compensation annually.
This proposal, commonly referred to as “say-on-pay”, provides stockholders an opportunity to provide an overall assessment of the compensation of our NEOs rather than focus on any specific item of compensation. The advisory vote is a non-binding vote on the compensation of theour NEOs, aswhich is described in the “Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis” section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure, set forth in this proxy statement. Although the results of the votingvote on this proposal are not binding on the Board, the Board and Compensation Committee value stockholders’ opinions and will take the results into account when making a determination concerningdetermining the future compensation of our NEOs. At the 20152022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a substantial majority of the votes, over 88%80%, were cast in favor of our NEO compensation.
As set forth in the “Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis” section of this proxy statement, our Compensation Committee structured the compensation of theour NEOs to emphasize the Company’sour pay-for-performance philosophy. Our compensation program is designed to attract and retain key executives responsible for our success and to provide motivation for both achieving short-term business goals and enhancing long-term stockholder value. Please read the “Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis” section for additional details.
We have embedded features in our overall compensation programs featureswhich are aligned with the objectives of our business and designed to strengthen the link between the interests of our executive officers and those of our stockholders. Following is a summary of compensation practices that we have adopted and a list of pay practices that we avoid.
| 56 | 2023 Proxy Statement | |||||||
What Insperity has:
| a | Compensation program emphasizing variable and at-risk compensation with at least 74% of each NEO’s target compensation tied to annual bonus and long-term incentives | |||||
| a | Long-term incentive program prioritizing performance-based LTI with 65% of the CEO’s and on average, 46% of the other NEO’s LTI mix in performance-based LTI | |||||
| a | Stock ownership guidelines | |||||
| Clawback policy for incentive compensation paid to any employee, including NEOs and other executive officers | ||||||
| Minimum vesting period of | ||||||
| Double trigger requirement for | ||||||
| Hedging policy | ||||||
| Pledging policy | ||||||
| Compensation Committee composed entirely of outside, independent directors | ||||||
| Independent compensation consultant hired by, and reporting directly to, the Compensation Committee | ||||||
What Insperity Does Not Have
does not have:
| Employment agreements with NEOs or other executive officers | ||||||
| Executive pension or other similar retirement or supplemental benefits | ||||||
| Single trigger change in control agreements for NEOs or other executive officers | ||||||
| Tax gross-ups in the event of a change in control | ||||||
| Medical coverage for retirees | ||||||
| Excessive benefits and perquisites | ||||||
Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Insperity’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.”
The Board recommends that stockholders indicate their support by selecting “For”“FOR” when voting on our executive compensation program. While the results of the advisory vote are non-binding, the Board and Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when evaluating whether any actions are necessary when consideringmaking future executive compensation decisions.
| The Board | ||
PROPOSAL NUMBER 3:4:
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF HOLDING THE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with an opportunity to make a non-binding recommendation on how often we should include a “say-on-pay” proposal in our proxy materials for future
| Insperity | 57 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
annual stockholder meetings (“say-on-pay frequency”). Under this Proposal 4, stockholders may recommend their preference to hold a say-on-pay advisory vote every year, every two years, or every three years.
At the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders voted on a similar proposal and a majority of votes recommended that we hold an annual advisory vote on executive compensation. In light of the 2017 stockholder advisory vote results, the Company has held a non-binding vote on NEO compensation annually thereafter. The Board has determined that continuing to hold a say-on-pay advisory vote every year remains a valuable opportunity for our stockholders to express their opinion and provide feedback on our compensation practices. We are, however, required to hold a say-on-pay frequency advisory vote every six years.
Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, on an advisory basis, that the stockholders’ preferred frequency for holding an advisory vote on the compensation paid to Insperity’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, shall either be once every year, once every two years, or once every three years, as determined by whichever frequency option receives the greatest number of votes cast.”
The Board recommends that stockholders vote to hold say-on-pay advisory votes every year (as opposed to every two years or three years). While the results of the advisory vote are non-binding, the Board and Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when evaluating whether it is in the best interest of our stockholders and the Company to hold a say-on-pay advisory vote more or less frequently than the option preferred by our stockholders.
| The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “ONE YEAR” for the say-on-pay frequency resolution. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise. | ||
PROPOSAL NUMBER 5:
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
General
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee has appointed the firm of Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) as the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.2023. If theour stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young, then the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment and may or may not consider the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 20162023 or future years. Ernst & Young has served as the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm since 1991. Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be present at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to respond to appropriate questions from those attending the meeting.
Fees of Ernst & Young
Ernst & Young’s fees for professional services totaled $1,154,300$1,698,694 in 20152022 and $1,096,610$1,537,875 in 2014.2021. During 20152022 and 2014,2021, Ernst & Young’s fees for professional services included the following:
•Audit Fees — fees for audit services, which relate to the consolidated audit, internal control audit in compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404, quarterly reviews, subsidiary audits and related matters, were $930,880$1,399,489 in 20152022 and $875,850$1,259,984 in 2014.2021.
•Audit-Related Fees — fees for audit-related services, which consisted primarily of the SOC 1 Report, the retirement plan audits, and quarterly agreed-upon procedures, were $220,920$294,705 in 20152022 and $218,360$273,391 in 2014.2021.
•Tax Fees — there were no fees for tax services in 20152022 or in 2014.2021.
•All Other Fees — there were fees of $2,500$4,500 in 20152022 and $2,400$4,500 in 2014,2021, which were annual subscription fees for Insperity’s use of Ernst and Young’s online research databases and other research tools.
| Insperity | 58 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee reviewed the non-audit services provided to the Companyus by Ernst & Young and considered whether Ernst & Young’sthe provision of such services was compatible with Ernst & Young maintaining its independence.
Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for Audit and Non-Audit Services
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee has established a policy that requires pre-approval of the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor. Unless a service proposed to be provided by the independent auditors has been pre-approved by the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee under its pre-approval policies and procedures, it will require specific pre-approval of the engagement terms by the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee. Under the policy, pre-approved service categories are generally provided for up to 12 months and must be detailed as to the particular services provided and sufficiently specific and objective so that no judgments by management are required to determine whether a specific service falls within the scope of what has been pre-approved. In connection with any pre-approval of services, the independent auditor is required to provide detailed back-up documentation concerning the specific services to be provided.
The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members, including a subcommittee of the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval actions taken by them to the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee does not delegate to management any of its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor.
None of the services related to the Audit-Related Fees or Other Fees described above was approved by the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee pursuant to the waiver of pre-approval provisions set forth in applicable rules of the SEC.
Required Affirmative Vote
If the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in favor of this proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal, the appointment of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016,2023, will be ratified. If the appointment of Ernst & Young is not ratified, the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.
| The Board and the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee recommend that stockholders vote | ||
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Delivery of Proxy Statement
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g.(e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more security holders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those security holders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for security holders and cost savings for companies. This year, a number of brokers and our transfer agent with account holders who are Insperity stockholders will be householding the Company’sour proxy materials. A single proxy statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholder. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement, please notify your broker and direct your written request to Insperity, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations Administrator, 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339, or contact the Investor Relations Administrator at 1-844-677-8332. The CompanyWe will promptly deliver a separate copy to you upon request.
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
In order for director nominations and stockholder proposals to have been properly submitted for presentation at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, noticewe must have been received by the Companynotice between the dates of January 23, 2023 and February 11, 2016, and March 12, 201622, 2023 in accordance with the Bylaws of the Company. On March 12, 2016, Starboard Value and Opportunity Master Fund Ltd nominated two candidates for director, which nominations were subsequently withdrawn in connection with the 2016 Agreement. Except as described above, the Companyour Bylaws. We received no such notice, and no stockholder director nominations or proposals will be presented at the 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
| Insperity | 59 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
Stockholder Proposals for 2017 Annual Meeting of StockholdersInclusion in Our 2024 Proxy Statement
Stockholder Director Nominations and Proposals for 20172024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
In addition, for stockholder proposals, our Bylaws require that the written notice set forth as to each matter such stockholder proposes to bring before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders: (1) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders; (2) the reasons for conducting such business at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders; (3) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of such stockholder; (4) the class and number of shares of our common stock that is beneficially owned by such stockholder; and (5) any material interest of such stockholder in such business. Stockholders are also advised to review our Bylaws regarding the requirements for submitting proposals.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A copy of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, as filed with the SEC, including any financial statements and schedules and exhibits thereto, may be obtained without charge by written request to Investor Relations Administrator, Insperity, Inc., 19001 Crescent Springs Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77339-3802.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Daniel D. Herink
General Counsel and Secretary
Kingwood, Texas
| Insperity | 60 | 2023 Proxy Statement | ||||||
INSPERITY, INC. INCENTIVE PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective May 22, 2023)
1.Objectives. This Insperity, Inc. Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), formerly known as the Insperity, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective June 16, 2017, as thereafter amended effective December 30, 2019, is intended as an incentive to retain and attract persons of training, experience and ability to serve as employees of Insperity, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and its Subsidiaries and as nonemployee directors of the Company, to encourage the sense of proprietorship of such persons and to stimulate the active interest of such persons in the development and financial success of the Company and its Subsidiaries.
2.Definitions. As used herein, the terms set forth below shall have the following respective meanings:
“Award” means an Employee Award or a Director Award.
“Award Agreement” means an agreement between the Company and a Participant in such form as is deemed acceptable by the Committee that sets forth the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to an Award.
“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
“Cash Award” means an Award payable in cash.
“Cause” shall have such meaning as specified in the Award Agreement.
“Change in Control” means:
(a)the date of the acquisition by any “person” (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act), excluding the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of 30% or more of either the then outstanding shares of common stock of the Company or the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; or
(b)the date the individuals who constitute the Board as of the Effective Date (the “Incumbent Board”), cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the members of the Board, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the Effective Date, whose appointment, election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the disinterested, non-management directors shall be, for purposes of this Plan, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board; or
(c)the date of consummation of a merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization, sale or disposition of all or a substantial portion of the Company’s assets or the issuance of shares of stock of the Company in connection with the acquisition of the stock or assets of another entity, provided, however, that a Change in Control shall not occur under this clause (c) if consummation of the transaction would result in at least 65% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company (or, if not the Company, the entity that succeeds to all or substantially all of the Company’s business) outstanding immediately after such transaction being beneficially owned (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act) by at least 65% of the holders of outstanding voting securities of the Company
-1-
immediately prior to the transaction, with the voting power of each such continuing holder relative to other such continuing holders not substantially altered in the transaction.
“Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
“Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or any other committee as may be designated by the Board.
“Common Stock” means the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company or any security into which such Common Stock may be changed by reason of any transaction or event of the type described in Section 13.
“Company” means Insperity, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
“Director” means a member of the Board, excluding any individual who is also an employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.
“Director Award” means any Option (other than an ISO), Performance Award, Phantom Stock Award, Cash Award, Stock Award, Stock Appreciation Right or Other Stock-Based Award, whether granted singly, in combination or in tandem, to a Participant who is a Director pursuant to any applicable terms, conditions and limitations as the Board may establish in order to fulfill the objectives of the Plan.
“Effective Date” means May 22, 2023.
“Employee” means an individual employed by the Company or any Subsidiary. For purposes of this Plan, an Employee also includes any individual who has been offered employment by the Company or any Subsidiary, provided that (a) any Award granted to such prospective employee shall be canceled if such individual fails to commence such employment, (b) no payment of value may be made in connection with such Award until such individual has commenced such employment and (c) such individual may not be granted an ISO prior to the date the individual actually commences employment.
“Employee Award” means any Option, Performance Award, Phantom Stock Award, Cash Award, Stock Award, Stock Appreciation Right or Other Stock-Based Award, whether granted singly, in combination or in tandem, to a Participant who is an Employee pursuant to any applicable terms, conditions and limitations as the Committee may establish in order to fulfill the objectives of the Plan.
“Exercise Price” means the price at which the Option Shares may be purchased or SARs may be exercised under the terms of the Award Agreement.
“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.
“Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock means, as of a particular date, (a) if shares of Common Stock are listed on a national securities exchange, the closing sales price per share of Common Stock on the consolidated transaction reporting system for the principal national securities exchange on which shares of Common Stock are listed on that date or, if there shall have been no such sale so reported on that date, on the last preceding date on which such a sale was so reported; (b) if the Common Stock is not so listed or quoted, the average of the closing bid and ask price on that date or, if there are no quotations available for such date, on the last preceding date on which such quotations shall be available, as reported by an inter-dealer quotation system; or (c) if none of the above is applicable, then such amount as may be determined by the Committee or the Board in such a manner as it deems in good faith to be the fair market value per share of Common Stock.
“Good Reason” shall mean an adverse constructive termination as such term is more specifically defined in the Award Agreement.
-2-
“Grant Date” means the date specified in the Award Agreement on which an Award will become effective.
“ISO” means an incentive stock option within the meaning of Code Section 422.
“Option” means a right to purchase a particular number of shares of Common Stock at a particular Exercise Price, subject to certain terms and conditions as provided in this Plan and Award Agreement. An Option may be in the form of an ISO or a nonqualified stock option within the meaning of Code Section 83.
“Option Shares” means the shares of Common Stock covered by a particular Option.
“Other Stock-Based Award” means any stock-based Award that shall consist of a right that is not an Option, Performance Award, Phantom Stock Award, Stock Award or SAR and is (i) denominated or payable in; (ii) valued in whole or in part by reference to; or (iii) otherwise based on or related to shares of Common Stock as is deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the terms of the Plan.
“Participant” means an Employee or a Director to whom an Award has been granted under this Plan.
“Performance Award” means an Award, such as a Performance Unit, that is subject to the achievement of one or more Performance Objectives established by the Committee.
“Performance Objectives” means the objectives, if any, established by the Committee that are to be achieved with respect to an Award granted under this Plan, which may be described in terms of Company-wide objectives, in terms of objectives that are related to performance of a division, Subsidiary, department, business unit, product, service, business solution, geographic market or function within the Company or a Subsidiary in which the Participant receiving the Award is employed, or in individual, worksite employee (including per individual, aggregate or average worksite employee(s)), or other terms, and which shall relate to the period of time determined by the Committee. The Performance Objectives may be with respect to, but not limited to, one or more of the following (including on a standalone basis, or in combination with, or in relation to, other Performance Objectives and which may be subject to adjustments determined at the time the Performance Goals are established): (a) cash flows; (b) client margin; (c) client retention; (d) customer margin; (e) earnings before interest and taxes; (f) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses; (g) earnings before taxes and unusual or nonrecurring items; (h) earnings per share; (i) earnings per share growth; (j) economic value added; (k) fee revenue; (l) gross mark-up per worksite employee; (m) gross profit; (n) net earnings; (o) number of paid worksite employees; (p) operating expenses; (q) operating income; (r) operating margin; (s) profit margin; (t) return on assets; (u) return on capital employed in the business; (v) return on equity; (w) return on investment; (x) return on sales; (y) return on total capital; (z) revenue; (aa) service efficiency; (bb) stock price performance; (cc) total profit; (dd) total revenue; (ee) total revenue less bonus payroll, (ff) total stockholder return and (gg) unit growth.
The Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion, at the time of grant of an Award, which Performance Objectives to use with respect to an Award, the weighting of such objectives if more than one is used and whether such objective(s) is (are) to be measured against a Company-established budget or target, an index or a peer group of companies. A Performance Objective may include multiple measuring levels, including but not limited to, threshold, target, stretch and maximum levels of performance with the size of the Performance Award based on the level attained of performance. A Performance Objective need not be based on an increase or a positive result and may include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses.
“Performance Unit” means a unit equivalent to $100 or such other value as determined by the Committee.
-3-
“Phantom Stock Award” means the right to receive the value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock.
“Plan” means the Insperity, Inc. Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective May 22, 2023, as may be amended from time to time, formerly known as the Insperity, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan.
“Prior 2017 Plan” means the Insperity, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective June 16, 2017, as thereafter amended effective December 30, 2019.
“Qualifying Termination” means a termination of a Participant’s employment that occurs within the time period following a Change in Control specified in the Award Agreement due to (i) a termination of employment by the Participant for Good Reason or (ii) an involuntary termination of the Participant’s employment by the Company, its Subsidiary or a successor to the Company other than for Cause, subject in each case to any further conditions imposed under the Award Agreement; provided, however, that a Participant’s termination of employment will be considered to be a Qualifying Termination for Good Reason only if (x) Good Reason is defined in the applicable Award Agreement and (y) the Participant has provided written notice to the Company of the condition the Participant claims constitutes Good Reason within ninety (90) days of the initial existence of such condition, the condition specified in the notice remains uncorrected for thirty (30) days after receipt of the notice by the Company, and the Participant actually terminates employment after the thirty (30) day correction period and before the expiration of the time limit required of a Qualifying Termination.
“Restricted Stock” means shares of Common Stock that are restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions.
“Restricted Stock Units” or “RSUs” means the right to receive the value of one share of Common Stock (or a percentage of such value) in cash, Common Stock or combination thereof.
“Stock Appreciation Rights” or “SARs” means the right to receive an amount of Common Stock equal to the appreciation in value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock over a particular period of time.
“Stock Award” means an Award denominated in or payable in shares of Common Stock, which may be Restricted Stock or an RSU.
“Subsidiary” means (a) with respect to any Awards other than ISOs, (i) in the case of a corporation, any corporation of which the Company directly or indirectly owns shares representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the shares of all classes or series of capital stock of such corporation that have the right to vote generally on matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of such corporation and (ii) in the case of a partnership or other business entity not organized as a corporation, any such business entity of which the Company directly or indirectly owns 50% or more of the voting, capital or profits interests (whether in the form of partnership interests, membership interests or otherwise) and (b) with respect to Awards of ISOs, any subsidiary within the meaning of Code Section 424(f).
3.Plan Administration and Designation of Participants. All Employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries and all Directors of the Company are eligible for Awards under this Plan. The Board or the Committee shall select the Participants from time to time by the grant of Employee Awards under this Plan and, subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, shall determine all terms and conditions of the Employee Awards.
This Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall have full and exclusive power to interpret this Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out this Plan as it may deem necessary or appropriate.
-4-
The Committee may, in its discretion, in whole or in part of an Employee Award, extend the exercisability, eliminate or make less restrictive any restrictions, waive any restriction or other provision of the Plan or an Employee Award or otherwise amend or modify an Employee Award in any manner that is either (a) not adverse to the Participant to whom such Employee Award was granted or (b) consented to by such Participant. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, without the prior approval of the Company’s stockholders, Options and SARs issued under the Plan will not be repriced, replaced or regranted through cancellation, decrease in the Exercise Price or exchanged for a cash buyout or settlement, except as provided by the adjustment provisions of Section 13.
No member of the Board or the Committee shall be liable for anything done or omitted to be done by him or her, by any member of the Board or the Committee or by any officer of the Company in connection with the performance of any duties under this Plan, except for his or her own willful misconduct or as expressly provided by statute.
The Board shall have the same powers as the Committee with respect to Director Awards. With respect to Director Awards, references in this Plan to the “Committee” shall be deemed to mean the Board.
4.Delegation of Authority. The Board or Committee may delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board the duties of the Committee under this Plan with respect to Employee Awards pursuant to such conditions or limitations as each may establish, except that neither may delegate to any person the authority to grant Awards to, or take other action with respect to, Participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
5.Award Agreement. Each Award granted hereunder shall be described in an Award Agreement, which shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan and shall be accepted in such manner as is deemed acceptable by the Committee by the Participant and by the appropriate officer for and on behalf of the Company.
6.Shares of Common Stock Reserved for this Plan.
(a)Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 13 hereof, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued pursuant to all Awards is 6,848,610 shares (which includes 5,523,610 shares that were previously approved by the Company’s stockholders for awards under the Prior 2017 Plan). Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing.
(b)The Committee and the appropriate officers of the Company shall from time to time take whatever actions are necessary to execute, acknowledge, file and deliver any documents required to be filed with or delivered to any governmental authority or any stock exchange or transaction reporting system on which shares of Common Stock are listed or quoted in order to make shares of Common Stock available for issuance pursuant to this Plan.
(c)Awards that are forfeited, terminated, or expire unexercised in such a manner that all or some of the shares underlying the Award are not issued to a Participant, shall again immediately become available for the granting of Awards under this Plan.
(d)The following shares of Common Stock shall be considered to have been issued under the Plan and may not again be made available for issuance as Awards under the Plan: (a) shares of Common Stock not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding Option or SAR; (b) shares of Common Stock withheld by the Company from shares of Common Stock that would otherwise have been delivered upon exercise of an Option or SAR, or shares of Common Stock tendered to the Company, in each case, in satisfaction of the grant or exercise price or tax withholding requirements of an Option or SAR; or (c) shares of Common Stock repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the Option exercise price. With
-5-
respect to SARs, when a SAR is exercised, the full number of shares of Common Stock exercised pursuant to such SAR shall be counted against the shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan notwithstanding that the number of shares of Common Stock issued to settle the SAR upon exercise is less than the number of shares of Common Stock exercised.
(e)For Awards other than Options and SARs, if the tax withholding obligation resulting from the settlement of any Award is satisfied by withholding shares of Common Stock, only the number of shares of Common Stock issued net of the shares of Common Stock withheld shall be deemed delivered for purposes of determining usage of shares against the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for delivery under the Plan or any sublimit set forth above.
(f)The Committee may from time to time adopt and observe such rules and procedures concerning the counting of shares against the Plan maximum or any sublimit as it may deem appropriate, including rules more restrictive than those set forth above to the extent necessary to satisfy the requirements of any national stock exchange on which the Common Stock is listed or any applicable regulatory requirement.
7.Employee Awards.
(a)Options. An Employee Award may be in the form of an Option. The Exercise Price of an Option granted under this Plan shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock at the time of the grant.
(i) Incentive Stock Options. Options granted to Employees hereunder may be ISOs. An ISO shall consist of a right to purchase a specified number of shares of Common Stock at a price specified by the Committee in the Award Agreement or otherwise, which shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant Date. Any ISO granted shall expire not later than ten (10) years after the Grant Date, with the expiration date to be specified by the Committee in the Award Agreement. Any ISO granted must, in addition to being subject to applicable terms, conditions and limitations established by the Committee, comply with Code Section 422. All other terms, conditions and limitations applicable to ISOs shall be determined by the Committee.
(ii) Nonqualified Stock Options. Options granted to Employees may be nonqualified stock options within the meaning of Code Section 83. A nonqualified stock option shall consist of a right to purchase a specified number of shares of Common Stock at a price specified by the Committee in the Award Agreement or otherwise, which shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant Date. The expiration date of the nonqualified stock option shall be specified by the Committee in the Award Agreement and shall not be later than ten (10) years after the Grant Date. All other terms, conditions and limitations applicable to nonqualified stock options shall be determined by the Committee.
(b)Performance Award. An Employee Award may be in the form of a Performance Award, such as a Performance Unit. A Performance Award shall be subject to the achievement of one or more Performance Objectives. All other terms, conditions and limitations applicable to Performance Awards shall be determined by the Committee.
(c)Stock Award (including Restricted Stock or RSUs). An Employee Award may consist of Common Stock or may be denominated in units of Common Stock. All terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Stock Award pursuant to this Plan shall be determined by the Committee.
-6-
(d)Phantom Stock Award. An Employee Award may be in the form of Phantom Stock or other bookkeeping account tied to the value of shares of Common Stock. All terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Phantom Stock Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(e)Stock Appreciation Right. An Employee Award may be in the form of SARs. All terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Employee Awards of SARs shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that the Exercise Price specified by the Committee in the Award Agreement or otherwise shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock at the Grant Date and the SAR shall expire no later than ten (10) years after the Grant Date.
(f)Cash Award. An Employee Award may be in the form of a Cash Award. All terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Cash Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(g)Other Stock-Based Awards. An Employee Award may be in the form of any Other Stock-Based Award. All terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Other Stock-Based Award shall be determined by the Committee.
(h)Employee Award Limits. The following limitations shall apply to any Award made hereunder:
(i) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Participant may be granted, during any one calendar year period, Options or SARs covering more than 750,000 shares of Common Stock.
(ii) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Participant may receive, during any one calendar year period, an aggregate payment in excess of $15,000,000 under any combination of Cash Awards and Performance Awards payable in cash.
(iii) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Participant may be granted, during any one calendar year period, more than 750,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to Stock Awards (excluding Restricted Stock but including RSUs), Phantom Stock Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards.
(iv) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Participant may be issued, during any one calendar year period, Restricted Stock covering more than 750,000 shares of Common Stock.
(i)Minimum Vesting for Employee Awards. All Employee Awards (other than Cash Awards) shall be granted subject to a minimum vesting period of one (1) year from the Grant Date, provided that:
(i)The Committee may provide for earlier vesting for an Employee Award upon a termination of employment by reason of death, disability, retirement or Change of Control.
(ii)In addition, the Committee may grant Employee Awards covering up to a maximum of 5% of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 6 (subject to adjustment under Section 13) that are not subject to a one (1) year minimum vesting period.
8.Directors Awards.
(a)Awards to Directors. The Board has the sole authority to grant Director Awards from time to time in accordance with this Section 8. Director Awards may consist of the forms of
-7-
Award described in Section 7, other than ISOs, and shall be granted subject to such terms and conditions as specified in Section 7, except with respect to vesting under Section 7(i).
(b)Director Award Limits. No Director may be granted during any one calendar year Director Awards having a value determined on the Grant Date that, when added to all cash compensation paid to the Director during the same calendar year excluding any amounts deferred from a prior calendar year, would exceed $1,000,000.
9.Payment of Awards.
(a)General. Payment of Awards may be made in the form of cash or, if permitted, by the Committee by transfer of Common Stock or combinations thereof and may include such restrictions as the Committee shall determine, including, in the case of Common Stock, restrictions on transfer and forfeiture provisions.
(b)Deferral. The Committee may, in its discretion, (i) permit selected Participants to elect to defer payments of some or all types of Awards in accordance with procedures established by the Committee or (ii) provide for the deferral of an Award in an Award Agreement or otherwise.
(c)Dividends and Interest. Dividends or dividend equivalent rights may be extended to and made part of any Award (excluding Options or SARs) denominated in Common Stock or units of Common Stock, subject to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee may establish. The Committee may also establish rules and procedures for the crediting of interest on deferred cash payments and dividend equivalents for deferred payment denominated in Common Stock or units of Common Stock. Dividends and dividend equivalents shall be subject to the same vesting provisions as the underlying Award and may accrue during an Award’s vesting period and be paid solely to the extent underlying shares vest.
(d)Substitution of Awards. At the discretion of the Committee, a Participant who has been granted an Employee Award may be offered an election to substitute an Employee Award for another Employee Award or Employee Awards of the same or different type, subject to the overall limits expressed in this Plan; provided, however, that except as provided in Section 3, in no event may the Exercise Price of an outstanding Option or SAR be reduced by modification, substitution or any method, nor exchanged for a cash buyout or settlement, without the prior approval of the Company’s stockholders.
(e)No Fractional Shares. The Committee shall not be required to issue any fractional shares of Common Stock under this Plan. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may provide for the elimination of fractions for the settlement of fractions in cash.
(f)No Reload Grants. Options shall not be granted under the Plan in consideration for and shall not be conditioned upon the delivery of shares of Common Stock to the Company in payment of the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligation under any other Option held by a Participant.
10.Option Exercise. The price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under an Option shall be paid in full at the time of exercise in cash or, if permitted by the Committee, by means of tendering Common Stock or surrendering all or part of that or any other Award, including Restricted Stock, valued at Fair Market Value on the date of exercise, or any combination thereof. The Committee shall determine acceptable methods for tendering Common Stock or Awards to exercise a stock option as it deems appropriate. The Committee may provide for procedures to permit the exercise or purchase of Awards by use of the proceeds to be received from the sale of Common Stock issuable pursuant to an Award. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, in the event shares of Restricted Stock are tendered as consideration for the exercise of a stock option, a number of the shares issued upon the exercise of the stock option, equal to the number of shares of Restricted Stock used as
-8-
consideration therefor, shall be subject to the same restrictions as the Restricted Stock so submitted as well as any additional restrictions that may be imposed by the Committee.
11.Termination of Employment or Service. Upon the termination of employment or service by a Participant, any unexercised, deferred or unpaid Awards shall be treated as provided in the specific Award Agreement evidencing the Award. Unless otherwise specifically provided in the Award Agreement, each Award granted pursuant to this Plan that is an Option shall immediately terminate to the extent the Option is not vested (or does not become vested as a result of such termination of employment or service) on the date the Participant terminates employment or service with the Company or its Subsidiaries.
12.Assignability. Unless otherwise permitted by the Committee, no Award granted under this Plan shall be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated by a Participant other than by (a) will or the laws of descent and distribution or (b) a qualified domestic relations order. During the lifetime of a Participant, any Award shall be exercisable only by him, or in the case of a Participant who is mentally incapacitated, the Award shall be exercisable by his guardian or legal representative. The Committee may prescribe and include in applicable Award Agreements other restrictions on transfer. Any attempted assignment or transfer in violation of this Section 12 shall be null and void. Upon the Participant’s death, the personal representative or other person entitled to succeed to the rights of the Participant (the “Successor Participant”) may exercise such rights. A Successor Participant must furnish proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to exercise the Award under the Participant’s will or under the applicable laws of descent and distribution.
Subject to approval by the Committee in its sole discretion, other than with respect to ISOs, all or a portion of the Awards granted to a Participant under this Plan may be transferable by the Participant, to the extent and only to the extent specified in such approval, to (a) the spouse, children or grandchildren (including adopted and stepchildren and grandchildren) of the Participant (“Immediate Family Members”), (b) a trust or trusts for the exclusive benefit of such Immediate Family Members and, if applicable, the Participant or (c) a partnership or partnerships in which such Immediate Family Members and, if applicable, the Participant are the only partners. Subsequent transfers of transferred Awards shall be prohibited except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless such transfers are made to the original Participant or a person to whom the original Participant could have made a transfer in the manner described herein. No transfer shall be effective unless and until written notice of such transfer is provided to the Committee, in the form and manner prescribed by the Committee. Following transfer, any such Awards shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to transfer, and except as otherwise provided herein, the term “Participant” shall be deemed to refer to the transferee. No transferred Options shall be exercisable unless arrangements satisfactory to the Company have been made to satisfy any tax withholding obligations the Company may have with respect to the Options. The consequences of termination of employment or service shall continue to be applied with respect to the original Participant, following which the Awards shall be exercisable by the transferee only to the extent and for the periods specified in this Plan and the Award Agreement.
13.Adjustments.
(a)The existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any manner the right or power of the Company or its stockholders to make or authorize (i) any or all adjustments, recapitalization, reorganizations or other changes in the ownership of the Company or its business, (ii) any merger or consolidation of the Company, (iii) any issue of bonds, debentures or other obligations, (iv) the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, (v) any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business or (vi) any other Company act or proceeding of any kind, whether or not of a character similar to that of the acts or proceedings enumerated above.
(b)In the event of any Common Stock distribution or split, recapitalization, extraordinary distribution, merger, consolidation, combination or exchange of shares of Common Stock or similar change or upon the occurrence of any other event that the Committee, in its sole
-9-
discretion, deems appropriate, (i) the number of shares of Common Stock reserved under this Plan and covered by outstanding Awards, (ii) the Exercise Price in respect of such Awards, (iii) the appropriate value and price determinations for such Awards, (iv) the per person limitation on Awards of Options and SARs and (v) the kind of shares covered thereby (including shares of another issuer) shall be adjusted as appropriate.
(c)In the event of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation, the Committee shall be authorized (i) to issue or assume Awards, regardless of whether in a transaction to which Section 424(a) of the Code applies, by means of substitution of new Awards, as appropriate, for previously issued Awards or to assume previously issued Awards as part of such adjustment, (ii) to make provision, prior to the transaction, for the termination of Options or SARs that remain unexercised at the time of such transaction or (iii) to provide for the cancellation of Awards (to the extent not otherwise provided under Section 14) in exchange for cash in an amount determined by the Board to be equal to the fair market value of such Awards on the date of such event, which in the case of Options or SARs shall be the excess of the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on such date over the exercise or strike price of such Award.
(d)The Committee, in its sole discretion and without the consent of the Participant, may amend (i) any stock-based Award to reflect a change in accounting rules required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and (ii) any Award to reflect a significant event that the Committee, in its sole discretion, believes to be appropriate to reflect the original intent in the grant of the Award.
14.Effect of Change in Control. Awards shall not immediately vest in the event of a Change in Control. However, in the event of a Change in Control:
(a) Unvested Awards shall become fully vested and immediately exercisable (i) on the date of the Change in Control if the continuing entity after a Change in Control fails to agree to assume, replace or substitute an Award with another award of equivalent or greater value, and on substantially similar or more favorable terms or (ii) to the extent specifically set forth in the Award Agreement, on the date of a Qualifying Termination, in each case, provided that the Participant has been in continuous employment since the Grant Date.
(b)With respect to determining the performance of Performance Awards, unvested Awards shall vest based on (i) actual performance results for any performance period that was completed on or prior to the date of the Change in Control and (ii) the greater of target level or actual performance (if measurable) for the performance period during which the Change in Control occurs and any performance period that was scheduled to begin after the date of the Change in Control. All Awards that vest pursuant to this Section 14(b) shall be paid on the date that is seventy-five (75) days after the end of the last originally scheduled and untruncated performance period applicable to the Award, unless another period is specified within an Award Agreement.
15.Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the right to deduct applicable taxes from any Award payment and withhold, at the time of delivery or vesting of cash or shares of Common Stock under this Plan, an appropriate amount of cash or number of shares of Common Stock or a combination thereof for payment of taxes required by law or to take such other action as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for withholding of such taxes. The Committee may also permit withholding to be satisfied by the transfer to the Company of shares of Common Stock theretofore owned by the holder of the Award with respect to which withholding is required. If shares of Common Stock are used to satisfy tax withholding, such shares shall be valued as provided in the applicable Award Agreement or as otherwise determined by the Committee.
-10-
16.Amendments or Termination. The Board may amend, alter or discontinue this Plan, except that (a) no amendment or alteration that would impair the rights of any Participant under any Award that he has been granted shall be made without his consent and (b) no amendment or alteration shall be effective prior to approval by the Company’s stockholders to the extent such approval is required by applicable legal requirements or the requirements of the securities exchange on which the Company’s Common Stock is listed.
17.Restrictions. No shares of Common Stock or other form of payment shall be issued with respect to any Award unless the Company shall be satisfied based on the advice of its counsel that such issuance will be in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws and the requirements of any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the Common Stock is then listed.
18.Unfunded Plan. Insofar as it provides for Awards of cash, Common Stock or rights thereto, this Plan shall be unfunded. Although bookkeeping accounts may be established with respect to Participants who are entitled to cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under this Plan, any such accounts shall be used merely as a bookkeeping convenience. The Company shall not be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by cash, Common Stock or rights thereto, nor shall this Plan be construed as providing for such segregation, nor shall the Company, the Board or the Committee be deemed to be a trustee of any cash, Common Stock or rights thereto to be granted under this Plan. Any liability or obligation of the Company to any Participant with respect to a grant of cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under this Plan shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations that may be created by this Plan and any Award Agreement, and no such liability or obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge or other encumbrance on any property of the Company. None of the Company, the Board or the Committee shall be required to give any security or bond for the performance of any obligation that may be created by this Plan.
19.Parachute Payment Limitation. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Plan, the Committee may provide in the Award Agreement or in any other agreement with the Participant for a limitation on the acceleration of vesting and exercisability of unmatured Awards to the extent necessary to avoid or mitigate the impact of the golden parachute excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code on the Participant. In the event the Award Agreement or other agreement with the Participant does not contain any contrary provision regarding the method of avoiding or mitigating the impact of the golden parachute excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code on the Participant, then notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Plan, the aggregate present value of all parachute payments payable to or for the benefit of a Participant, whether payable pursuant to this Plan or otherwise, shall be limited to three times the Participant’s base amount less one dollar. The order of such limitation, to the extent necessary, shall be: (a) severance payments; (b) cash payments outside of the Plan; and (c) unvested Performance Awards, in order that this limitation not be exceeded. For purposes of this Section 19, the terms “parachute payment,” “base amount” and “present value” shall have the meanings assigned thereto under Section 280G of the Code. It is the intention of this Section 19 to avoid excise taxes on the Participant under Section 4999 of the Code or the disallowance of a deduction to the Company pursuant to Section 280G of the Code.
20.Code Section 409A Compliance. The Board intends that any Awards under the Plan satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and related regulations and Treasury pronouncements (“Section 409A”) to avoid the imposition of excise taxes thereunder. If any provision of the Plan or an Award Agreement under the Plan would result in the imposition of an excise tax under Section 409A, that provision will be reformed to avoid imposition of the excise tax and no action taken to comply with Section 409A shall be deemed to impair the rights of any Participant under the Plan or an Award Agreement under the Plan. Any distribution or payment to a Participant identified by the Company as a “specified employee” within the meaning of 409A shall be delayed to the extent required to comply with Section 409A.
21.Indemnification. The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless any member of the Board or the Committee and other individuals, including Employees and Directors, performing services on
-11-
behalf of the Committee, against any liability, cost or expense arising as a result of any claim asserted by any person or entity under the laws of any state or of the United States with respect to any action or failure to act of such individuals taken in connection with this Plan, except claims or liabilities arising on account of the willful misconduct or bad faith of such Board member, Committee member or individual.
22.Right to Employment or Service. The granting of any Award shall not impose upon the Company any obligation to maintain any Participant as an Employee or a Director and shall not diminish the power of the Company to terminate any Participant’s employment or service at any time.
23.Governing Law. This Plan and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by mandatory provisions of the Code or the securities laws of the United States, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.
24.Clawback/Recoupment Policy. Notwithstanding any provisions in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, all Awards and/or amounts payable thereunder, whether in the form of cash or otherwise, shall be subject to potential cancellation, rescission, clawback and recoupment (i) in accordance with the terms of the clawback/recoupment policy adopted by the Company, as such policy may be amended from time to time and/or (i) to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and any regulations or listing requirements promulgated thereunder.
25.Effective Date of the Amended and Restated Plan. This Plan, as amended and restated herein, shall be effective as of the Effective Date, subject to approval of the Plan at the 2023 annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company. If the stockholders of the Company should fail to so approve this Plan on such date, this Plan shall not be of any force or effect and the Prior 2017 Plan shall continue in force and effect.
-12-
